BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “charitable trust”+ Carry Forward of Lossesclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai426Karnataka247Delhi154Bangalore140Ahmedabad90Jaipur61Kolkata50Pune49Chandigarh45Chennai39Hyderabad32Cochin29Lucknow24Visakhapatnam23Surat16Indore13Amritsar13Cuttack12Allahabad10Nagpur9Rajkot9Telangana9Raipur7Varanasi6Jodhpur4SC3Patna2Dehradun2Ranchi2Guwahati2Agra1Orissa1Punjab & Haryana1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)3Section 103Section 1442Exemption2Addition to Income2

S.B. BHATTACHARJEE MEMORIAL TRUST FOR CHILDREN EDUCATION ,DIGBOI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH, DIBRUGARH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 245/GTY/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati09 May 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 11Section 143(1)Section 234ASection 234C

loss of Rs. 1,07,491/- during the year under consideration, the ld. Addl. CIT(A) ought to have hold that in any view of the matter, the ld. A0 was not justified in arbitrarily and whimsically assessing the total income of the appellant at Rs. 87,13,857/- and determining the total tax liability of the appellant

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR TEACHER EDUCATION,KHETRI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(4), GUWAHATI , GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 16/GTY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati10 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Sri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) & Sri Rakesh Mishra

Section 10Section 144Section 250Section 272B

carrying on business in the guise of the trust, hence the deposits in the bank account were nothing but the business receipts which were liable to be added. The Ld. CIT(A) in para 7 at page 7 of the impugned order has mentioned that the assessee failed to demonstrate that the transactions are accounted for in the name