BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

64 results for “capital gains”+ Section 23clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,192Delhi3,290Bangalore1,517Chennai1,123Ahmedabad881Kolkata825Jaipur713Hyderabad580Pune442Chandigarh394Surat362Indore301Karnataka292Cochin185Visakhapatnam178Raipur175Rajkot125Nagpur108Agra98Cuttack90Lucknow89Amritsar84SC71Calcutta67Guwahati64Telangana56Panaji43Patna33Jabalpur30Jodhpur30Dehradun28Ranchi25Allahabad15Varanasi13Kerala11Rajasthan9Gauhati2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Orissa2Punjab & Haryana2Andhra Pradesh2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1

Key Topics

Section 80I68Section 153A47Addition to Income36Section 143(3)31Disallowance30Section 153D25Section 26324Deduction22Section 92B21

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 58/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 143(30 on 24.12.2018 in both the cases, i.e. after the search carried out upon the assessee on 20.11.2017. It is almost after more than one year. He again accepted the claim of long-term capital gain on sale of these shares. Thus according to the ld. Counsel for the assessee, it was an incorrect approach

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 52/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 143(30 on 24.12.2018 in both the cases, i.e. after the search carried out upon the assessee on 20.11.2017. It is almost after more than one year. He again accepted the claim of long-term capital gain on sale of these shares. Thus according to the ld. Counsel for the assessee, it was an incorrect approach

Showing 1–20 of 64 · Page 1 of 4

Section 8020
Section 25018
Long Term Capital Gains6

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. BHAGWATI DEVII BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 59/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 143(30 on 24.12.2018 in both the cases, i.e. after the search carried out upon the assessee on 20.11.2017. It is almost after more than one year. He again accepted the claim of long-term capital gain on sale of these shares. Thus according to the ld. Counsel for the assessee, it was an incorrect approach

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 53/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 143(30 on 24.12.2018 in both the cases, i.e. after the search carried out upon the assessee on 20.11.2017. It is almost after more than one year. He again accepted the claim of long-term capital gain on sale of these shares. Thus according to the ld. Counsel for the assessee, it was an incorrect approach

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 55/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 143(30 on 24.12.2018 in both the cases, i.e. after the search carried out upon the assessee on 20.11.2017. It is almost after more than one year. He again accepted the claim of long-term capital gain on sale of these shares. Thus according to the ld. Counsel for the assessee, it was an incorrect approach

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 56/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 143(30 on 24.12.2018 in both the cases, i.e. after the search carried out upon the assessee on 20.11.2017. It is almost after more than one year. He again accepted the claim of long-term capital gain on sale of these shares. Thus according to the ld. Counsel for the assessee, it was an incorrect approach

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 57/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 143(30 on 24.12.2018 in both the cases, i.e. after the search carried out upon the assessee on 20.11.2017. It is almost after more than one year. He again accepted the claim of long-term capital gain on sale of these shares. Thus according to the ld. Counsel for the assessee, it was an incorrect approach

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 51/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 143(30 on 24.12.2018 in both the cases, i.e. after the search carried out upon the assessee on 20.11.2017. It is almost after more than one year. He again accepted the claim of long-term capital gain on sale of these shares. Thus according to the ld. Counsel for the assessee, it was an incorrect approach

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 54/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 143(30 on 24.12.2018 in both the cases, i.e. after the search carried out upon the assessee on 20.11.2017. It is almost after more than one year. He again accepted the claim of long-term capital gain on sale of these shares. Thus according to the ld. Counsel for the assessee, it was an incorrect approach

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 60/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 143(30 on 24.12.2018 in both the cases, i.e. after the search carried out upon the assessee on 20.11.2017. It is almost after more than one year. He again accepted the claim of long-term capital gain on sale of these shares. Thus according to the ld. Counsel for the assessee, it was an incorrect approach

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 61/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 143(30 on 24.12.2018 in both the cases, i.e. after the search carried out upon the assessee on 20.11.2017. It is almost after more than one year. He again accepted the claim of long-term capital gain on sale of these shares. Thus according to the ld. Counsel for the assessee, it was an incorrect approach

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 62/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 143(30 on 24.12.2018 in both the cases, i.e. after the search carried out upon the assessee on 20.11.2017. It is almost after more than one year. He again accepted the claim of long-term capital gain on sale of these shares. Thus according to the ld. Counsel for the assessee, it was an incorrect approach

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 63/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 143(30 on 24.12.2018 in both the cases, i.e. after the search carried out upon the assessee on 20.11.2017. It is almost after more than one year. He again accepted the claim of long-term capital gain on sale of these shares. Thus according to the ld. Counsel for the assessee, it was an incorrect approach

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 64/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 143(30 on 24.12.2018 in both the cases, i.e. after the search carried out upon the assessee on 20.11.2017. It is almost after more than one year. He again accepted the claim of long-term capital gain on sale of these shares. Thus according to the ld. Counsel for the assessee, it was an incorrect approach

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 65/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 143(30 on 24.12.2018 in both the cases, i.e. after the search carried out upon the assessee on 20.11.2017. It is almost after more than one year. He again accepted the claim of long-term capital gain on sale of these shares. Thus according to the ld. Counsel for the assessee, it was an incorrect approach

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 66/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

section 143(30 on 24.12.2018 in both the cases, i.e. after the search carried out upon the assessee on 20.11.2017. It is almost after more than one year. He again accepted the claim of long-term capital gain on sale of these shares. Thus according to the ld. Counsel for the assessee, it was an incorrect approach

M/S. BHARTIA-SMSIL(JV),GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 117/GTY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati17 Jun 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.117/Gau/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2014-15)

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Modi, FCAFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Dal, Addl. CIT, Sr. Dr
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 3Section 92BSection 92C

23. The Kolhapur Canesugar Works Ltd. judgment also concerned itself with the applicability of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act to the deletion of Rule 10 and 10A of the Central Excise Rules on 6th August, 1977. 24. An attempt was made in General Finance Company &Anr. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Punjab

SHREE SAI SMELTERS (I) LIMITED,BYRNIHAT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-SHILLONG, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 228/GTY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati31 Jul 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.228/Gau/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2014-15) Shree Shai Smelters (I) Ltd. Vs. Acit, Circle-Shillong

For Appellant: Shri J.P. Gupta, FCAFor Respondent: Shri T. Hunar, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 40ASection 92B

23. The Kolhapur Canesugar Works Ltd. judgment also concerned itself with the applicability of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act to the deletion of Rule 10 and 10A of the Central Excise Rules on 6th August, 1977. 14 Shree Shai Smelters (I) Ltd. Assessment Year:2014-15 24. An attempt was made in General Finance Company &Anr. v. Assistant

SHIVANI ISPAT AND ROLLING MILL (P) LTD.,BYRNIHAT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-SHILLONG, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 227/GTY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati31 Jul 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.227/Gau/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2014-15) Shivani Ispatand Rolling Mill Vs. Acit, Circle-Shillong (P) Ltd. 13Th Mile, Tamulkuchi, Byrnihat, G.S. Road, Ri-Bhoi, Meghalaya "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aafcs 3465 B (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant By :Shri J.P. Gupta, Fca Respondent By :Shri T. Hunar, Jcit, Sr. Dr सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 15/06/2020 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 31/07/2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. A. L. Saini: The Captioned Appeal Filed By The Assessee, Pertaining To Assessment Year 2014-15, Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal)- Shillong, In Appeal No. Cit(A)/Shg/10083/2018-19 Dated 17.04.2019, Which In Turn Arises Out Of An Assessment Order Passed By The Assessing Officer U/S 143(3) / 92C(4) / 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short The ‘Act’) Dated 30/11/2018. 2.When This Appeal Was Called Out For Hearing, The Ld. Counsel For The Assessee Invited Our Attention To The Order Dated 10.06.2020, Passed By The Tribunal In The Case Of M/S Raipur Steel Casting India (P) Ltd. & Srinath Ji Furnishing Pvt. Ltd. In I.T.A. No. 895& 1035/Kol/2019, For Assessment Year 2014-15.Wherein Thetribunal Held That Effect Of Omission Of Clause (I) Of Section 92Ba W.E.F 01.04.2017 Had The Effect Of It Being Omitted From Its Inception Hence, Reference

For Appellant: Shri J.P. Gupta, FCAFor Respondent: Shri T. Hunar, JCIT, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 40ASection 92B

23. The Kolhapur Canesugar Works Ltd. judgment also concerned itself with the applicability of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act to the deletion of Rule 10 and 10A of the Central Excise Rules on 6th August, 1977. 14 Shivani Ispat and Rolling Mill (P) Ltd. Assessment Year:2014-15 24. An attempt was made in General Finance Company

AGRIM INFRAPROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee i

ITA 219/GTY/2019[2012-13]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 153ASection 250Section 68

23. We have duly considered the rival contentions and gone through the record carefully. A provision is being made in the accounts for contingent liability. Sometime a liability is discernable but its complete crystallization cannot be ensured on the basis of material available and therefore, a provision of certain expenses are being made and if a provision is found genuine