D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. BHAGWATI DEVII BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

2) for scrutinising their returns. Therefore, in their case, the assessments would be construed as completed it. Those completed assessments could be tinkered with for assessing the income under section 153A only, if during the course of search, some incriminating material was discovered and seized. In other words, the addition in an assessment under section 153A could be made with

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

2) for scrutinising their returns. Therefore, in their case, the assessments would be construed as completed it. Those completed assessments could be tinkered with for assessing the income under section 153A only, if during the course of search, some incriminating material was discovered and seized. In other words, the addition in an assessment under section 153A could be made with

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

2) for scrutinising their returns. Therefore, in their case, the assessments would be construed as completed it. Those completed assessments could be tinkered with for assessing the income under section 153A only, if during the course of search, some incriminating material was discovered and seized. In other words, the addition in an assessment under section 153A could be made with

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

2) for scrutinising their returns. Therefore, in their case, the assessments would be construed as completed it. Those completed assessments could be tinkered with for assessing the income under section 153A only, if during the course of search, some incriminating material was discovered and seized. In other words, the addition in an assessment under section 153A could be made with

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

2) for scrutinising their returns. Therefore, in their case, the assessments would be construed as completed it. Those completed assessments could be tinkered with for assessing the income under section 153A only, if during the course of search, some incriminating material was discovered and seized. In other words, the addition in an assessment under section 153A could be made with

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

2) for scrutinising their returns. Therefore, in their case, the assessments would be construed as completed it. Those completed assessments could be tinkered with for assessing the income under section 153A only, if during the course of search, some incriminating material was discovered and seized. In other words, the addition in an assessment under section 153A could be made with

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

2) for scrutinising their returns. Therefore, in their case, the assessments would be construed as completed it. Those completed assessments could be tinkered with for assessing the income under section 153A only, if during the course of search, some incriminating material was discovered and seized. In other words, the addition in an assessment under section 153A could be made with

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

2) for scrutinising their returns. Therefore, in their case, the assessments would be construed as completed it. Those completed assessments could be tinkered with for assessing the income under section 153A only, if during the course of search, some incriminating material was discovered and seized. In other words, the addition in an assessment under section 153A could be made with

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

2) for scrutinising their returns. Therefore, in their case, the assessments would be construed as completed it. Those completed assessments could be tinkered with for assessing the income under section 153A only, if during the course of search, some incriminating material was discovered and seized. In other words, the addition in an assessment under section 153A could be made with

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

2) for scrutinising their returns. Therefore, in their case, the assessments would be construed as completed it. Those completed assessments could be tinkered with for assessing the income under section 153A only, if during the course of search, some incriminating material was discovered and seized. In other words, the addition in an assessment under section 153A could be made with

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

2) for scrutinising their returns. Therefore, in their case, the assessments would be construed as completed it. Those completed assessments could be tinkered with for assessing the income under section 153A only, if during the course of search, some incriminating material was discovered and seized. In other words, the addition in an assessment under section 153A could be made with

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

2) for scrutinising their returns. Therefore, in their case, the assessments would be construed as completed it. Those completed assessments could be tinkered with for assessing the income under section 153A only, if during the course of search, some incriminating material was discovered and seized. In other words, the addition in an assessment under section 153A could be made with

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

2) for scrutinising their returns. Therefore, in their case, the assessments would be construed as completed it. Those completed assessments could be tinkered with for assessing the income under section 153A only, if during the course of search, some incriminating material was discovered and seized. In other words, the addition in an assessment under section 153A could be made with

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

2) for scrutinising their returns. Therefore, in their case, the assessments would be construed as completed it. Those completed assessments could be tinkered with for assessing the income under section 153A only, if during the course of search, some incriminating material was discovered and seized. In other words, the addition in an assessment under section 153A could be made with

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-SHILLONG, SHILLONG vs. M/S. DHAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeal of revenue is partly allowed

capital in a year. Valid notices u/s. 143(2) & 142(1) of the Act were issued. Various details were called for by the ld. AO, which the assessee has filed. Income assessed at Rs.4,84,36,311/- after making following disallowances :- Returned Income : Rs.1,21,98,600 ADD: Disallowance u/s 40(b)(v) [paras 3] Rs. 66,43,474 Disallowance

UDAI CHAND CHOPRA,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. No.55/Gty/2019 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Udai Chand Chopra……….......…..…………....................……….……Appellant C/O Kamal Kumar Golchha, Room No.10, Ram Kumar Plaza, 2Nd Floor, Chatribari Road, Guwahati-781001. [Pan: Abqpc9800P] Vs. Ito, Ward-2(2), Guwahati ……..…............…….......................…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri S. P. Bhati, Fca, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri N.T Sherpa, Jcit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : February 27, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : March 13, 2023 Order Per Manish Borad: This Appeal At The Instance Of The Assessee Pertaining To The Assessment Year (In Short “Ay”) 2014-15 Is Directed Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Guwahati-1, Guwahati [In Short Ld. “Cit(A)”] Dated 31.12.2018 Which Is Arising Out Of The Order U/S 144 Of The Assessing Officer Dated 23.12.2016. 2. The Assessee In This Appeal Has Taken The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

section 2 of the Income Tax Act, whether at all any agricultural operations were carried out on the said land by the appellant or any of his family members, whether any agricultural income from the said land was declared in past returns of the appellant, what were the crops being cultivated on the said land, whether any seeds, etc were

AGRIM INFRAPROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee i

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

24. In the result, ITA Nos. 219/GAU/2019 is allowed and ITA No. 224/GAU/2019 is allowed for statistical purposes. 25. Now we take ITA No. 222/GAU/2019. Assessment Years: 2012-2013, 2015-16, 2012-13 Agrim Infraproject Private Limited The assesse is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of ld. CIT(Appeals), Guwahati-2, Guwahati dated 15.02.2019 passed

AGRIM INFRAPROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee i

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

24. In the result, ITA Nos. 219/GAU/2019 is allowed and ITA No. 224/GAU/2019 is allowed for statistical purposes. 25. Now we take ITA No. 222/GAU/2019. Assessment Years: 2012-2013, 2015-16, 2012-13 Agrim Infraproject Private Limited The assesse is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of ld. CIT(Appeals), Guwahati-2, Guwahati dated 15.02.2019 passed