BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “capital gains”+ Section 155clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai564Delhi446Bangalore168Jaipur148Ahmedabad146Chennai130Karnataka118Hyderabad98Chandigarh97Cochin73Kolkata73Calcutta51Pune41Indore36Raipur32Lucknow30Cuttack24Nagpur22Rajkot19SC15Surat14Amritsar7Telangana6Guwahati6Jabalpur5Visakhapatnam4Jodhpur4Varanasi4Rajasthan3Andhra Pradesh1Panaji1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 153A15Section 686Disallowance6Addition to Income6Section 2504Section 80I4Section 92C4Section 115J3Section 143(2)3Unexplained Cash Credit

AGRIM INFRAPROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee i

ITA 224/GTY/2019[2012-13]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 153ASection 250Section 68

section 133A of the. I.T. Act, 1961 on 07.04.2015 by the DDIT flnv), Kolkata wherein he has stated that various paper companies controlled and managed by different entry operators are trading in different penny stocks including the scrip of M/s CCL International Ltd. through broking firms for providing accommodation entries in the form of Long Term Capital Gain to various

AGRIM INFRAPROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee i

3
Natural Justice3
Exemption3
ITA 222/GTY/2019[2015-16]Status: Heard
ITAT Guwahati
05 Apr 2023
AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 153ASection 250Section 68

section 133A of the. I.T. Act, 1961 on 07.04.2015 by the DDIT flnv), Kolkata wherein he has stated that various paper companies controlled and managed by different entry operators are trading in different penny stocks including the scrip of M/s CCL International Ltd. through broking firms for providing accommodation entries in the form of Long Term Capital Gain to various

AGRIM INFRAPROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee i

ITA 219/GTY/2019[2012-13]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 153ASection 250Section 68

section 133A of the. I.T. Act, 1961 on 07.04.2015 by the DDIT flnv), Kolkata wherein he has stated that various paper companies controlled and managed by different entry operators are trading in different penny stocks including the scrip of M/s CCL International Ltd. through broking firms for providing accommodation entries in the form of Long Term Capital Gain to various

GREENPLY INDUSTRIES LIMITED,TINSUKIA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-TINSUKIA, TINSUKIA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for A

ITA 232/GTY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati21 Jun 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey & Shri Manish Borad

Section 115JSection 143(2)Section 80ISection 92C

155 of 2018 (Cal.) and in the case of CIT –vs.- Rasoi Limited (335 ITR 438 (Cal.). Further reliance was placed on the judgment of the Hon’ble Special Bench decision of Mumbai Tribunal in the case of DCIT –vs.- Reliance Industries Limited (2004) 88 ITD 273 (MUM)(SB), wherein it was held that where the object of the subsidy

ACIT, CIRCLE - TINSUKIA , TINSUKIA vs. M/S. GREENPLY INDUSTRIES LTD., TINSUKIA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee for A

ITA 359/GTY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati21 Jun 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri A.T. Varkey & Shri Manish Borad

Section 115JSection 143(2)Section 80ISection 92C

155 of 2018 (Cal.) and in the case of CIT –vs.- Rasoi Limited (335 ITR 438 (Cal.). Further reliance was placed on the judgment of the Hon’ble Special Bench decision of Mumbai Tribunal in the case of DCIT –vs.- Reliance Industries Limited (2004) 88 ITD 273 (MUM)(SB), wherein it was held that where the object of the subsidy

GREENLAM INDUSTRIES LIMITED,TINSUKIA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-TINSUKIA, TINSUKIA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed as per the terms indicated above

ITA 402/GTY/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati19 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 115JSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 244ASection 25Section 250Section 251(1)(a)Section 31(3)(a)

gains of business or profession”. 28. What needs to be examined whether the alleged expense has been expended wholly and exclusively for the purposes of business. In the instant case, it is not in dispute that the leasehold lands taken by the assessee on lease are used for carrying out business operation and the lumpsum lease money was paid