BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 140clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi568Mumbai540Bangalore252Chennai149Kolkata111Ahmedabad88Jaipur77Chandigarh72Cochin62Hyderabad49Raipur40Pune31Rajkot22Surat22Calcutta20Indore20Lucknow19Cuttack16Nagpur10SC9Jabalpur6Karnataka6Visakhapatnam5Amritsar5Dehradun5Guwahati3Allahabad3Rajasthan3Jodhpur3Ranchi2Orissa1Agra1Punjab & Haryana1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Andhra Pradesh1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)10Section 808Section 2504Section 80I4Section 139(9)4Section 80A4Section 2633Section 139(4)2Deduction2

MUKESH J\KUMAR AGARWALLAA,GUWAHATI vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 47/GTY/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati09 Oct 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri S. P. Bhati, FCAFor Respondent: Shri I. Gyaneshori Devi, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 263

140/-. Case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny on the following three main reasons: (a) Mis-match between turnover as per GST/Service Tax return and income-tax return. (b) Large cash deposits in savings bank account and (c) Suspicious sale transaction in shares and exempt LTCG shown in the return. 3.1. In the course of assessment, assessee appeared

DEEPA JHUNJHUNWALA,SHILLONG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, SHILLONG, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 126/GTY/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati28 Oct 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: the Ld. CIT(A) and thereafter aggrieved the assessee has approached the ITAT with the following grounds:

Section 139(4)Section 139(9)Section 143(1)Section 250Section 80Section 80ASection 80I

Capital Receipt, and therefore, not chargeable to tax. 4. Without prejudice to the grounds taken here-in-above, the computation of total income made vide the impugned Intimation U/s. 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 at Rs. 17,48,190/-, is not in accordance with the provisions of Income Tax Act, 1961. 5. That the appellant craves leave

DEEPA JHUNJHUNWALA,SHILLONG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -1, SHILLONG, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 127/GTY/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati28 Oct 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: the Ld. CIT(A) and thereafter aggrieved the assessee has approached the ITAT with the following grounds:

Section 139(4)Section 139(9)Section 143(1)Section 250Section 80Section 80ASection 80I

Capital Receipt, and therefore, not chargeable to tax. 4. Without prejudice to the grounds taken here-in-above, the computation of total income made vide the impugned Intimation U/s. 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 at Rs. 17,48,190/-, is not in accordance with the provisions of Income Tax Act, 1961. 5. That the appellant craves leave