BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

45 results for “capital gains”+ Section 11(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,740Delhi2,126Chennai747Bangalore594Ahmedabad583Jaipur572Hyderabad520Kolkata386Pune315Chandigarh287Indore269Surat170Raipur162Cochin153Nagpur139Rajkot125Visakhapatnam119Lucknow90Amritsar77Panaji64Dehradun48Cuttack47Guwahati45Patna42Ranchi37Agra36Jodhpur36Allahabad17Jabalpur17Varanasi7

Key Topics

Section 153A48Section 153D25Section 25024Addition to Income24Section 14819Section 143(3)18Section 6812Section 14712Section 13211

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 65/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

11. After the search, in order to give logical end to this proceeding, notices under section 153A were issued to all these assessees and they have filed their details (compiled in the above table). The cases of all these assessees were centralized with Central Circle 4(3), Kolkata, but the assessees challenged such centralisation before the Hon’ble Guwahati High

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 66/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

11. After the search, in order to give logical end to this proceeding, notices under section 153A were issued to all these assessees and they have filed their details (compiled in the above table). The cases of all these assessees were centralized with Central Circle 4(3), Kolkata, but the assessees challenged such centralisation before the Hon’ble Guwahati High

Showing 1–20 of 45 · Page 1 of 3

Disallowance11
Long Term Capital Gains9
Unexplained Cash Credit6

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 51/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

11. After the search, in order to give logical end to this proceeding, notices under section 153A were issued to all these assessees and they have filed their details (compiled in the above table). The cases of all these assessees were centralized with Central Circle 4(3), Kolkata, but the assessees challenged such centralisation before the Hon’ble Guwahati High

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 57/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

11. After the search, in order to give logical end to this proceeding, notices under section 153A were issued to all these assessees and they have filed their details (compiled in the above table). The cases of all these assessees were centralized with Central Circle 4(3), Kolkata, but the assessees challenged such centralisation before the Hon’ble Guwahati High

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 53/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

11. After the search, in order to give logical end to this proceeding, notices under section 153A were issued to all these assessees and they have filed their details (compiled in the above table). The cases of all these assessees were centralized with Central Circle 4(3), Kolkata, but the assessees challenged such centralisation before the Hon’ble Guwahati High

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 54/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

11. After the search, in order to give logical end to this proceeding, notices under section 153A were issued to all these assessees and they have filed their details (compiled in the above table). The cases of all these assessees were centralized with Central Circle 4(3), Kolkata, but the assessees challenged such centralisation before the Hon’ble Guwahati High

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 55/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

11. After the search, in order to give logical end to this proceeding, notices under section 153A were issued to all these assessees and they have filed their details (compiled in the above table). The cases of all these assessees were centralized with Central Circle 4(3), Kolkata, but the assessees challenged such centralisation before the Hon’ble Guwahati High

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 56/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

11. After the search, in order to give logical end to this proceeding, notices under section 153A were issued to all these assessees and they have filed their details (compiled in the above table). The cases of all these assessees were centralized with Central Circle 4(3), Kolkata, but the assessees challenged such centralisation before the Hon’ble Guwahati High

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 52/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

11. After the search, in order to give logical end to this proceeding, notices under section 153A were issued to all these assessees and they have filed their details (compiled in the above table). The cases of all these assessees were centralized with Central Circle 4(3), Kolkata, but the assessees challenged such centralisation before the Hon’ble Guwahati High

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 58/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

11. After the search, in order to give logical end to this proceeding, notices under section 153A were issued to all these assessees and they have filed their details (compiled in the above table). The cases of all these assessees were centralized with Central Circle 4(3), Kolkata, but the assessees challenged such centralisation before the Hon’ble Guwahati High

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. BHAGWATI DEVII BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 59/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

11. After the search, in order to give logical end to this proceeding, notices under section 153A were issued to all these assessees and they have filed their details (compiled in the above table). The cases of all these assessees were centralized with Central Circle 4(3), Kolkata, but the assessees challenged such centralisation before the Hon’ble Guwahati High

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 60/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

11. After the search, in order to give logical end to this proceeding, notices under section 153A were issued to all these assessees and they have filed their details (compiled in the above table). The cases of all these assessees were centralized with Central Circle 4(3), Kolkata, but the assessees challenged such centralisation before the Hon’ble Guwahati High

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 61/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

11. After the search, in order to give logical end to this proceeding, notices under section 153A were issued to all these assessees and they have filed their details (compiled in the above table). The cases of all these assessees were centralized with Central Circle 4(3), Kolkata, but the assessees challenged such centralisation before the Hon’ble Guwahati High

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 62/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

11. After the search, in order to give logical end to this proceeding, notices under section 153A were issued to all these assessees and they have filed their details (compiled in the above table). The cases of all these assessees were centralized with Central Circle 4(3), Kolkata, but the assessees challenged such centralisation before the Hon’ble Guwahati High

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 63/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

11. After the search, in order to give logical end to this proceeding, notices under section 153A were issued to all these assessees and they have filed their details (compiled in the above table). The cases of all these assessees were centralized with Central Circle 4(3), Kolkata, but the assessees challenged such centralisation before the Hon’ble Guwahati High

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 64/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

11. After the search, in order to give logical end to this proceeding, notices under section 153A were issued to all these assessees and they have filed their details (compiled in the above table). The cases of all these assessees were centralized with Central Circle 4(3), Kolkata, but the assessees challenged such centralisation before the Hon’ble Guwahati High

SMT. SANTOSH BAMALWA,DIBRUGARH vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 348/GTY/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati13 Mar 2026AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri Rajesh Kumarsmt. Santosh Bamalwa Acit, Circle-1 C/O A.K. Varma, Ground Floor, Aayakar Bhawan, 2Nd Floor, Vs. Mahalaya Road, Dibrugarh- Milan Nagar, Dibrugarh-786003, 786001, Assam Assam (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aedpb9900P Assessee By : Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Santosh Kumar Karnani, Addl. Cit Date Of Hearing: 09/03/2026 Date Of Pronouncement: 13/03/2026 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Santosh Kumar Karnani, Addl
Section 10(38)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 68

4 Smt. Santosh Bamalwa Vs ACIT the Assessing Officer primarily relied on the investigation report of Directorate of Investigation, Kolkata in respect of 84 penny stocks. However, we note that the impugned scrip of Twenty First Century (India) Ltd. was not included in the said list. We note that the Assessing Officer noted that the said scrip is penny stock

AGRIM INFRAPROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee i

ITA 219/GTY/2019[2012-13]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 153ASection 250Section 68

11. It is also pertinent to note that, in the case of Kabul Chawla (supra), the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in its concluding paragraph has observed that, on the date of the search, the assessments for assessment years 2002-03, 2005-06 and 2006-07 already stood completed and the returns in these years were accepted under Section

AGRIM INFRAPROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee i

ITA 222/GTY/2019[2015-16]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 153ASection 250Section 68

11. It is also pertinent to note that, in the case of Kabul Chawla (supra), the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in its concluding paragraph has observed that, on the date of the search, the assessments for assessment years 2002-03, 2005-06 and 2006-07 already stood completed and the returns in these years were accepted under Section

AGRIM INFRAPROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee i

ITA 224/GTY/2019[2012-13]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati05 Apr 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 153ASection 250Section 68

11. It is also pertinent to note that, in the case of Kabul Chawla (supra), the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in its concluding paragraph has observed that, on the date of the search, the assessments for assessment years 2002-03, 2005-06 and 2006-07 already stood completed and the returns in these years were accepted under Section