BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

110 results for “capital gains”+ Section 10(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai7,135Delhi5,445Bangalore2,317Chennai2,091Kolkata1,636Ahmedabad1,446Jaipur1,065Hyderabad995Pune782Surat629Chandigarh487Indore482Karnataka445Cochin330Visakhapatnam319Raipur248Rajkot220Nagpur193Amritsar159Cuttack156Lucknow149Agra145Guwahati110Panaji106SC95Telangana93Calcutta93Ranchi77Dehradun67Patna65Jodhpur63Jabalpur41Allahabad33Kerala21Varanasi21Rajasthan8Punjab & Haryana8Orissa7A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Gauhati2Andhra Pradesh2ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Himachal Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 80I78Section 143(3)67Addition to Income59Section 153A50Deduction37Section 14836Section 6834Section 14734Disallowance32Section 263

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 66/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made by the assessee, all the respondents carried the dispute in appeals before the ld. 1st Appellate Authority. The assessees have raised two-fold submissions. In the first fold of submissions, it was contended that they have filed returns under section 139(1

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 65/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made by the assessee, all the respondents carried the dispute in appeals before the ld. 1st Appellate Authority. The assessees have raised two-fold submissions. In the first fold of submissions, it was contended that they have filed returns under section 139(1

Showing 1–20 of 110 · Page 1 of 6

27
Section 153D25
Reopening of Assessment17

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 51/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made by the assessee, all the respondents carried the dispute in appeals before the ld. 1st Appellate Authority. The assessees have raised two-fold submissions. In the first fold of submissions, it was contended that they have filed returns under section 139(1

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 57/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made by the assessee, all the respondents carried the dispute in appeals before the ld. 1st Appellate Authority. The assessees have raised two-fold submissions. In the first fold of submissions, it was contended that they have filed returns under section 139(1

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 53/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made by the assessee, all the respondents carried the dispute in appeals before the ld. 1st Appellate Authority. The assessees have raised two-fold submissions. In the first fold of submissions, it was contended that they have filed returns under section 139(1

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 54/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made by the assessee, all the respondents carried the dispute in appeals before the ld. 1st Appellate Authority. The assessees have raised two-fold submissions. In the first fold of submissions, it was contended that they have filed returns under section 139(1

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 55/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made by the assessee, all the respondents carried the dispute in appeals before the ld. 1st Appellate Authority. The assessees have raised two-fold submissions. In the first fold of submissions, it was contended that they have filed returns under section 139(1

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 56/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made by the assessee, all the respondents carried the dispute in appeals before the ld. 1st Appellate Authority. The assessees have raised two-fold submissions. In the first fold of submissions, it was contended that they have filed returns under section 139(1

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 52/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made by the assessee, all the respondents carried the dispute in appeals before the ld. 1st Appellate Authority. The assessees have raised two-fold submissions. In the first fold of submissions, it was contended that they have filed returns under section 139(1

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 58/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made by the assessee, all the respondents carried the dispute in appeals before the ld. 1st Appellate Authority. The assessees have raised two-fold submissions. In the first fold of submissions, it was contended that they have filed returns under section 139(1

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. BHAGWATI DEVII BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 59/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made by the assessee, all the respondents carried the dispute in appeals before the ld. 1st Appellate Authority. The assessees have raised two-fold submissions. In the first fold of submissions, it was contended that they have filed returns under section 139(1

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 60/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made by the assessee, all the respondents carried the dispute in appeals before the ld. 1st Appellate Authority. The assessees have raised two-fold submissions. In the first fold of submissions, it was contended that they have filed returns under section 139(1

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 61/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made by the assessee, all the respondents carried the dispute in appeals before the ld. 1st Appellate Authority. The assessees have raised two-fold submissions. In the first fold of submissions, it was contended that they have filed returns under section 139(1

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 62/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made by the assessee, all the respondents carried the dispute in appeals before the ld. 1st Appellate Authority. The assessees have raised two-fold submissions. In the first fold of submissions, it was contended that they have filed returns under section 139(1

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 63/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made by the assessee, all the respondents carried the dispute in appeals before the ld. 1st Appellate Authority. The assessees have raised two-fold submissions. In the first fold of submissions, it was contended that they have filed returns under section 139(1

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 64/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

10(38) and made additions in the respective hands of each assessee. 16. Dissatisfied with the additions made by the assessee, all the respondents carried the dispute in appeals before the ld. 1st Appellate Authority. The assessees have raised two-fold submissions. In the first fold of submissions, it was contended that they have filed returns under section 139(1

SAROJ DEVI SAND,SILCHAR vs. INCOEM TAX OFFICER, WARD-3, SILCHAR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA

ITA 51/GTY/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati23 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

1) of the Act. During the course of assessment proceedings, the ld. Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee has earned long-term capital gain of Rs.52,83,100/- from sale of equity shares of Parag Shilpa Investments Limited and exemption under section 10

INDER CHAND SAND,SILCHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, SILCHAR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA

ITA 49/GTY/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati23 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

1) of the Act. During the course of assessment proceedings, the ld. Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee has earned long-term capital gain of Rs.52,83,100/- from sale of equity shares of Parag Shilpa Investments Limited and exemption under section 10

DEVENDER KUMAR PRASHAR,DELHI vs. ASST. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 176/GTY/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati25 Feb 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: The Ld. Cit(A) Also, The Assessee Could Not Succeed On The Basis Of The Following Findings:

Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 250

capital gain for Rs. 42,08,406/- contrary to the scope of section 143(1) of Income Tax Act. 3. That the Ld. CIT (A) also erred on facts and in law and failed to appreciate the facts of the case (a) That The Ld. CIT (A) has misread and misunderstood the provision of section 143(1

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-DIMAPUR, DIMAPUR vs. SHRI ANKIT AGARWALLA, DIMAPUR

In the result, all the appeals of revenue are dismissed

ITA 140/GTY/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati25 Feb 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 147Section 148Section 149Section 151

capital gains since the assessee had sold the same within three years from the date of becoming the owner. The order of the Assessing Officer was upheld by the Karnataka High Court. The said decision is clearly distinguishable and is not applicable in the instant case. Similarly, reliance by the department on the decision of the Bombay High Court