D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. BHAGWATI DEVII BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

capital gain (LTCG) as capital gain (LTCG) as exempt income, exempt income, therefore, we take up all these

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

capital gain (LTCG) as capital gain (LTCG) as exempt income, exempt income, therefore, we take up all these

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

capital gain (LTCG) as capital gain (LTCG) as exempt income, exempt income, therefore, we take up all these

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

capital gain (LTCG) as capital gain (LTCG) as exempt income, exempt income, therefore, we take up all these

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

capital gain (LTCG) as capital gain (LTCG) as exempt income, exempt income, therefore, we take up all these

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

capital gain (LTCG) as capital gain (LTCG) as exempt income, exempt income, therefore, we take up all these

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

capital gain (LTCG) as capital gain (LTCG) as exempt income, exempt income, therefore, we take up all these

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

capital gain (LTCG) as capital gain (LTCG) as exempt income, exempt income, therefore, we take up all these

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

capital gain (LTCG) as capital gain (LTCG) as exempt income, exempt income, therefore, we take up all these

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

capital gain (LTCG) as capital gain (LTCG) as exempt income, exempt income, therefore, we take up all these

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

capital gain (LTCG) as capital gain (LTCG) as exempt income, exempt income, therefore, we take up all these

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

capital gain (LTCG) as capital gain (LTCG) as exempt income, exempt income, therefore, we take up all these

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

capital gain (LTCG) as capital gain (LTCG) as exempt income, exempt income, therefore, we take up all these

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

capital gain (LTCG) as capital gain (LTCG) as exempt income, exempt income, therefore, we take up all these

SHRI KOMAL KUMBHAT,GUWAHATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), GUWAHATI

Bench: Shri Sanjay Gargi.T.A No.136/Gty/2020 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Shri Komal Kumbhat…………...................................................……Appellant 234, G.N.B Road, 2Nd Floor, Opposite Gauhati Club Bus Stand-Above Sarita Restaurant, Guwahati-781003. [Pan: Aedpk8036P] Vs. Ito, Ward-2(1), Guwahati...…...................……........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri H. S. Kumbhat, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri N. T. Sherpa, Jcit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : March 14, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : May 25, 2023 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य "वारा / Per Sanjay Garg: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 02.03.2020 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)- Guwahati-1, Guwahati (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Cit(A)’) Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). 2. The Assessee In This Appeal Through Various Grounds Of Appeal Has Agitated Two Issues I.E. (I) Addition Made/Confirmed By The Lower Authorities On Long-Term Capital Gains Claimed By The Assessee Of Rs.21,80,417/- Treating The Same As Bogus & Thereby Adding The Same

capital gains claimed by the assessee of Rs.21,80,417/- treating the same as bogus and thereby adding

AJAY KUMAR TANTIA,KOLKATA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(1), GUWAHATI

In the result, effective grounds raised by the assessee are partly allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove and other grounds being general in nature need no adjudication

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Manish Boradi.T.A. No.328/Gty/2019 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Ajay Kumar Tantia, Kolkata.....…..…………....................……….……Appellant 7B, Ground Floor, Kiran Shankar Roy Road, Kolkata-1. [Pan: Abkpt3130B] Vs. Ito, Ward-4(1), Guwahati ……..…............…….......................…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri S. P. Bhati, Fca, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Amit Kumar Pandey, Jcit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : January 31, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : February 06, 2023 Order Per Manish Borad: This Appeal At The Instance Of The Assessee Pertaining To The Assessment Year (In Short “Ay”) 2014-15 Is Directed Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Guwahati-2, Guwahati [In Short Ld. “Cit(A)”] Dated 31.05.2019 Which Is Arising Out Of The Order U/S 143(3) Of The Assessing Officer Dated 23.12.2016. 2. The Assessee In This Appeal Has Taken The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

capital gain arising from trading of such scrips is bogus. In assessee’s case, short-term capital

SMT. SANTOSH BAMALWA,DIBRUGARH vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri Rajesh Kumarsmt. Santosh Bamalwa Acit, Circle-1 C/O A.K. Varma, Ground Floor, Aayakar Bhawan, 2Nd Floor, Vs. Mahalaya Road, Dibrugarh- Milan Nagar, Dibrugarh-786003, 786001, Assam Assam (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aedpb9900P Assessee By : Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Santosh Kumar Karnani, Addl. Cit Date Of Hearing: 09/03/2026 Date Of Pronouncement: 13/03/2026 O R D E R

capital gain and income from other sources. The assessee has sold 50,000 equity shares of Twenty First

DEVENDER KUMAR PRASHAR,DELHI vs. ASST. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: The Ld. Cit(A) Also, The Assessee Could Not Succeed On The Basis Of The Following Findings:

capital gain from a disclosed figure of Rs. 6,41,972/- to an enhanced figure of Rs. 42,08,406/- under