BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 69Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi355Mumbai321Jaipur120Ahmedabad70Chandigarh70Chennai64Cochin58Bangalore58Kolkata52Rajkot36Hyderabad29Surat23Agra20Lucknow19Pune19Nagpur19Indore14Jodhpur11Patna7Amritsar6Visakhapatnam4Guwahati4Raipur4Cuttack3Ranchi3Dehradun2Varanasi2Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 153C4Addition to Income4Section 69A2Section 1482Section 682Section 153A2Section 143(3)2Section 69C2Deduction2

RISHI AGARWAL,GUWAHATI vs. ITO, WARD-2(2), GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 266/GTY/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati24 Jun 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 69C

purchases from the suppliers who are either non-filers or have filed non-business ITR or reflected a substantially lower turnover in ITR as compared to turnover shown in GSTR1 return. There is a possibility that assessee has booked bogus expenses in order to reduce its profit / taxable income. x. Further, it is seen that, the Assessing Officer has done

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI vs. RAMSWARUP BAJAJ, ASSAM

In the result, appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 113/GTY/2023[2018-19]Status: Disposed
ITAT Guwahati
09 Feb 2026
AY 2018-19
Section 68Section 69A

sections": [ "69A", "68" ], "issues": "Whether the CIT(A) was justified in deleting the addition for bogus unsecured loans and share purchase

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, SHILLONG vs. SATINDER SINGH DHARIWAL, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 17/GTY/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Oct 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2016-17

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT
Section 133(6)Section 147Section 148Section 69A

69A arising out of dealing in bogus penny stock. 2 Satinder Singh, AY: 2016-17 3. From the order sheet entries, we not that no one has represented the assessee before the Tribunal in the past as well as today except for one day where the assessee himself appeared and sought adjournment. 4. Before us, Ld. Sr. DR contended that

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, GUWAHATI vs. FORTUNE VANIJYA PRIVATE LIMITED, GUWAHATI

In the result both the appeal of the Revenue and the cross objections of the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 21/GTY/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati10 Dec 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Hon’Ble V.P (Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 153CSection 68

purchase was made which was challenged by the owner contending that the land was part of park. The Minister directed public enquiry and on the basis of the report submitted, confirmed the order. Interfering with the finding of the Minister and setting aside the order, the Court of Appeal stated; "The first and the most important matter to bear