GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

purchased during this period and the date in the satisfaction note is incorrectly noted. 7. We have considered the submission made. Apparently, no incriminating material was found during the course of search. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, Central-3 vs. Abhisar Buildwell

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

purchased during this period and the date in the satisfaction note is incorrectly noted. 7. We have considered the submission made. Apparently, no incriminating material was found during the course of search. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, Central-3 vs. Abhisar Buildwell

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

purchased during this period and the date in the satisfaction note is incorrectly noted. 7. We have considered the submission made. Apparently, no incriminating material was found during the course of search. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, Central-3 vs. Abhisar Buildwell

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

purchased during this period and the date in the satisfaction note is incorrectly noted. 7. We have considered the submission made. Apparently, no incriminating material was found during the course of search. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, Central-3 vs. Abhisar Buildwell

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

purchased during this period and the date in the satisfaction note is incorrectly noted. 7. We have considered the submission made. Apparently, no incriminating material was found during the course of search. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, Central-3 vs. Abhisar Buildwell

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

purchased during this period and the date in the satisfaction note is incorrectly noted. 7. We have considered the submission made. Apparently, no incriminating material was found during the course of search. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, Central-3 vs. Abhisar Buildwell

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

purchased during this period and the date in the satisfaction note is incorrectly noted. 7. We have considered the submission made. Apparently, no incriminating material was found during the course of search. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, Central-3 vs. Abhisar Buildwell

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

purchased during this period and the date in the satisfaction note is incorrectly noted. 7. We have considered the submission made. Apparently, no incriminating material was found during the course of search. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, Central-3 vs. Abhisar Buildwell

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

purchased during this period and the date in the satisfaction note is incorrectly noted. 7. We have considered the submission made. Apparently, no incriminating material was found during the course of search. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, Central-3 vs. Abhisar Buildwell

AGRIM INFRAPROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee i

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

69,210/- declared by the assessee. After this assessment order, a Assessment Years: 2012-2013, 2015-16, 2012-13 Agrim Infraproject Private Limited search was carried out at the premises of the assessee on 17.09.2015. The ld. Assessing Officer thereafter issued a notice under section 153A of the Income Tax Act. The assessee has filed return of income in response

AGRIM INFRAPROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee i

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

69,210/- declared by the assessee. After this assessment order, a Assessment Years: 2012-2013, 2015-16, 2012-13 Agrim Infraproject Private Limited search was carried out at the premises of the assessee on 17.09.2015. The ld. Assessing Officer thereafter issued a notice under section 153A of the Income Tax Act. The assessee has filed return of income in response

AGRIM INFRAPROJECT PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, GUWAHATI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee i

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

69,210/- declared by the assessee. After this assessment order, a Assessment Years: 2012-2013, 2015-16, 2012-13 Agrim Infraproject Private Limited search was carried out at the premises of the assessee on 17.09.2015. The ld. Assessing Officer thereafter issued a notice under section 153A of the Income Tax Act. The assessee has filed return of income in response

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI vs. RAMSWARUP BAJAJ, ASSAM

In the result, appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

69 of the Id. CIT (A), wherein in paragraph 3 to 5 the Id. CIT (A)\nhas held as follows:-\n\"3. That, no enquiry seems to have been conducted by the Investigation wing (i.e. during\nthe course of post search investigation) or by the AO (i.e. during the course of the\nassessment proceedings) with any of the party whose

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

bogus by the Ld. A.O on partial and inappropriate consideration of the financials of the said company. From the financial statements of Jackson Investment Ltd. for the years ended 31.03.2013 & 31.03.2014 (enclosed at pages 167- 168 of PB-4), it is seen that the turnover of the said company was approximately 13.20 crores, 35.47 cores and 20.09 crores

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

bogus by the Ld. A.O on partial and inappropriate consideration of the financials of the said company. From the financial statements of Jackson Investment Ltd. for the years ended 31.03.2013 & 31.03.2014 (enclosed at pages 167- 168 of PB-4), it is seen that the turnover of the said company was approximately 13.20 crores, 35.47 cores and 20.09 crores

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

bogus by the Ld. A.O on partial and inappropriate consideration of the financials of the said company. From the financial statements of Jackson Investment Ltd. for the years ended 31.03.2013 & 31.03.2014 (enclosed at pages 167- 168 of PB-4), it is seen that the turnover of the said company was approximately 13.20 crores, 35.47 cores and 20.09 crores

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

bogus by the Ld. A.O on partial and inappropriate consideration of the financials of the said company. From the financial statements of Jackson Investment Ltd. for the years ended 31.03.2013 & 31.03.2014 (enclosed at pages 167- 168 of PB-4), it is seen that the turnover of the said company was approximately 13.20 crores, 35.47 cores and 20.09 crores

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

bogus by the Ld. A.O on partial and inappropriate consideration of the financials of the said company. From the financial statements of Jackson Investment Ltd. for the years ended 31.03.2013 & 31.03.2014 (enclosed at pages 167- 168 of PB-4), it is seen that the turnover of the said company was approximately 13.20 crores, 35.47 cores and 20.09 crores