BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 57clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai635Delhi360Jaipur135Kolkata119Bangalore103Chennai96Chandigarh79Ahmedabad74Cochin57Indore51Surat47Hyderabad43Raipur34Rajkot31Pune25Allahabad25Nagpur23Agra22Lucknow18Visakhapatnam18Amritsar16Jodhpur15Patna11Jabalpur6Dehradun5Cuttack2Guwahati2Ranchi1Varanasi1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 10(26)3Section 1482Deduction2Addition to Income2

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, SHILLONG vs. SATINDER SINGH DHARIWAL, KOLKATA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 17/GTY/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Oct 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2016-17

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Arun Bhowmick, JCIT
Section 133(6)Section 147Section 148Section 69A

section 148 was issued on 25.03.2019 and sent by Speed Post No. EE41579902IN on 25.03.2019 to the assessee for reassessment of income during the FY 2015-16 relevant to the AY 2016-17.” 7. Assessee did not file any return in response to notice u/s. 148 issued by the Ld. AO. Ld. AO thereafter, called for information by issuing notices

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD NORTH LAKHIMPUR vs. BIRI KAKUM, ESS SECTOR

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 170/GTY/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati16 Oct 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: The Ld. Ao. The Ld. Ao Was Not Satisfied With The Response Given By The Assessee & Made The Impugned Addition With The Following Finding:

Section 10(26)Section 145(3)Section 250

Section 250 of Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter “the Act”) passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereafter “the Ld. CIT(A)”], dated 16.04.2025. 2 In this case, the Ld. AO found that the assessee had made substantial purchase from suppliers, who are either non-filers or have filed non-business ITRs