BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

25 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 56(2)(vii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi210Mumbai165Jaipur70Cochin57Chandigarh51Bangalore50Amritsar34Ahmedabad29Kolkata28Guwahati25Chennai21Rajkot19Surat18Jodhpur16Indore15Nagpur12Visakhapatnam11Hyderabad10Lucknow6Raipur4Allahabad2Ranchi2Jabalpur1Pune1

Key Topics

Section 153C27Section 2509Section 689Section 40A(3)9Section 369Depreciation9Disallowance9Addition to Income9

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 118/GTY/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

vii. ITA No. 116/GTY/2024: A.Y. 2019-20: “1 For that assessment order passed u/s 153C 143(3) is bad in law and liable to be quashed as no proper satisfaction has been recorded as required under the provision of I.T. Act. 2 For that additions made by the A.O. and upheld

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Showing 1–20 of 25 · Page 1 of 2

ITA 110/GTY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

vii. ITA No. 116/GTY/2024: A.Y. 2019-20: “1 For that assessment order passed u/s 153C 143(3) is bad in law and liable to be quashed as no proper satisfaction has been recorded as required under the provision of I.T. Act. 2 For that additions made by the A.O. and upheld

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 111/GTY/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

vii. ITA No. 116/GTY/2024: A.Y. 2019-20: “1 For that assessment order passed u/s 153C 143(3) is bad in law and liable to be quashed as no proper satisfaction has been recorded as required under the provision of I.T. Act. 2 For that additions made by the A.O. and upheld

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 112/GTY/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

vii. ITA No. 116/GTY/2024: A.Y. 2019-20: “1 For that assessment order passed u/s 153C 143(3) is bad in law and liable to be quashed as no proper satisfaction has been recorded as required under the provision of I.T. Act. 2 For that additions made by the A.O. and upheld

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 113/GTY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

vii. ITA No. 116/GTY/2024: A.Y. 2019-20: “1 For that assessment order passed u/s 153C 143(3) is bad in law and liable to be quashed as no proper satisfaction has been recorded as required under the provision of I.T. Act. 2 For that additions made by the A.O. and upheld

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 114/GTY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

vii. ITA No. 116/GTY/2024: A.Y. 2019-20: “1 For that assessment order passed u/s 153C 143(3) is bad in law and liable to be quashed as no proper satisfaction has been recorded as required under the provision of I.T. Act. 2 For that additions made by the A.O. and upheld

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 115/GTY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

vii. ITA No. 116/GTY/2024: A.Y. 2019-20: “1 For that assessment order passed u/s 153C 143(3) is bad in law and liable to be quashed as no proper satisfaction has been recorded as required under the provision of I.T. Act. 2 For that additions made by the A.O. and upheld

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 116/GTY/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

vii. ITA No. 116/GTY/2024: A.Y. 2019-20: “1 For that assessment order passed u/s 153C 143(3) is bad in law and liable to be quashed as no proper satisfaction has been recorded as required under the provision of I.T. Act. 2 For that additions made by the A.O. and upheld

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 117/GTY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

vii. ITA No. 116/GTY/2024: A.Y. 2019-20: “1 For that assessment order passed u/s 153C 143(3) is bad in law and liable to be quashed as no proper satisfaction has been recorded as required under the provision of I.T. Act. 2 For that additions made by the A.O. and upheld

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 60/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

56,85,498 PB-4 BAMALWA Ltd. 5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 61/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

56,85,498 PB-4 BAMALWA Ltd. 5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 62/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

56,85,498 PB-4 BAMALWA Ltd. 5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 63/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

56,85,498 PB-4 BAMALWA Ltd. 5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 64/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

56,85,498 PB-4 BAMALWA Ltd. 5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 65/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

56,85,498 PB-4 BAMALWA Ltd. 5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 51/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

56,85,498 PB-4 BAMALWA Ltd. 5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 66/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

56,85,498 PB-4 BAMALWA Ltd. 5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 52/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

56,85,498 PB-4 BAMALWA Ltd. 5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 53/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

56,85,498 PB-4 BAMALWA Ltd. 5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 54/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

56,85,498 PB-4 BAMALWA Ltd. 5 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,05,02,867 PB-5 BAMALWA India Ltd. 6 HANS RAJ 2012-13 Twenty First Century 3,94,72,552 PB-6 BAMALWA India Ltd. (H.U.F) 7 USHA BAMALWA 2012-13 Twenty First Century 4,04,76,152 PB-7 India Ltd. 8 MEENAKSHI