BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

47 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 41(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai773Delhi458Jaipur175Chennai153Kolkata123Bangalore107Ahmedabad98Hyderabad76Chandigarh72Cochin58Surat54Pune49Amritsar49Rajkot47Guwahati47Indore46Raipur39Visakhapatnam29Allahabad28Lucknow25Nagpur24Agra20Jodhpur16Patna12Varanasi6Dehradun5Jabalpur4Panaji2Cuttack2

Key Topics

Section 6854Section 14837Addition to Income31Section 153C29Section 25020Section 14715Section 153A15Disallowance12Section 40A(3)9

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 54/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 55/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

Showing 1–20 of 47 · Page 1 of 3

Section 369
Reassessment9
Depreciation9

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 61/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 63/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 51/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 66/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 62/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 64/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. BHAGWATI DEVII BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 59/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 56/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 57/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 58/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 52/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 65/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 53/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 60/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati03 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

For Appellant: (1) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153Section 153C

section 143(3) on 30.03.2016. If this information was possessed by the Revenue in 2014, then why, while assessing the income of the assessee from assignment of sub-contract of the above projects was accepted by the Revenue. It could have been enquired at that point of time and assessee could be show-caused that it is a bogus profit

ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 40/GTY/2022[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati03 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

For Appellant: (1) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153Section 153C

section 143(3) on 30.03.2016. If this information was possessed by the Revenue in 2014, then why, while assessing the income of the assessee from assignment of sub-contract of the above projects was accepted by the Revenue. It could have been enquired at that point of time and assessee could be show-caused that it is a bogus profit

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 111/GTY/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

41,000/- u/s 36. I.T.A. Nos.: 110 to 118/GTY/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 to 2021-22 Greenwood Resorts Private Limited. 5 The Appellant craves the leave to take Additional Grounds and/or amend the above grounds of appeal at the time of hearing of Appeal.” vi. ITA No. 115/GTY/2024: A.Y. 2018-19: 1 For that assessment order passed u/s 153C/143

GREENWOOD RESORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUWAHATI

In the result, ITA No. 114/GTY/2024 for AY 2017-18 is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 113/GTY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati29 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 153CSection 250Section 36Section 40A(3)Section 68

41,000/- u/s 36. I.T.A. Nos.: 110 to 118/GTY/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 to 2021-22 Greenwood Resorts Private Limited. 5 The Appellant craves the leave to take Additional Grounds and/or amend the above grounds of appeal at the time of hearing of Appeal.” vi. ITA No. 115/GTY/2024: A.Y. 2018-19: 1 For that assessment order passed u/s 153C/143