BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

51 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 41(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,672Delhi1,118Jaipur328Kolkata307Chennai295Ahmedabad217Bangalore180Surat148Pune143Hyderabad133Chandigarh120Karnataka112Indore91Cochin60Raipur60Amritsar59Rajkot58Nagpur53Guwahati51Visakhapatnam40Lucknow37Calcutta36Cuttack30Allahabad29Agra23Jodhpur17Patna14Telangana7Varanasi6Dehradun5Jabalpur5Panaji4Ranchi3SC3Bombay1

Key Topics

Section 6858Section 14838Addition to Income35Section 153C33Section 25021Section 153A17Section 14716Disallowance12Section 40A(3)9

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(4), GUWAHATI vs. SINU SONTHALIA, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is partly allowed

ITA 308/GTY/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati19 Sept 2022AY 2015-16
Section 131Section 131(1)Section 133(6)Section 143(2)Section 41(1)

section 41(1) of the Act needs to be invoked and creditors/credit liabilities should be treated as income chargeable to tax. 14. In view of our above observations let us examine the alleged sundry creditors. As far as addition of Rs. 93,89,186/- in name Mr. Alok Sonthalia (husband of the assessee) is concerned, we find that Mr. Alok

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Showing 1–20 of 51 · Page 1 of 3

Section 369
Reassessment9
Depreciation9
ITA 63/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 60/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 65/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. BHAGWATI DEVII BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 59/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 66/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 64/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 58/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 54/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 51/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 55/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 52/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 56/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 61/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 57/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 53/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 62/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

41. In the Cross Objections, the assessee-respondents have pleaded that though ld. CIT(Appeals) has deleted the addition on the ground that in the absence of any incriminating material, no addition could be made under section 153A. In other words, on the basis of legal ground, but the assessees have emphasized that the issue on merit ought to have

ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 40/GTY/2022[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati03 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

For Appellant: (1) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153Section 153C

section 143(3) on 30.03.2016. If this information was possessed by the Revenue in 2014, then why, while assessing the income of the assessee from assignment of sub-contract of the above projects was accepted by the Revenue. It could have been enquired at that point of time and assessee could be show-caused that it is a bogus profit

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati03 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

For Appellant: (1) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153Section 153C

section 143(3) on 30.03.2016. If this information was possessed by the Revenue in 2014, then why, while assessing the income of the assessee from assignment of sub-contract of the above projects was accepted by the Revenue. It could have been enquired at that point of time and assessee could be show-caused that it is a bogus profit

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, GUWAHATI vs. FORTUNE VANIJYA PRIVATE LIMITED, GUWAHATI

In the result both the appeal of the Revenue and the cross objections of the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 21/GTY/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati10 Dec 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Hon’Ble V.P (Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 153CSection 68

purchase was made which was challenged by the owner contending that the land was part of park. The Minister directed public enquiry and on the basis of the report submitted, confirmed the order. Interfering with the finding of the Minister and setting aside the order, the Court of Appeal stated; "The first and the most important matter to bear