BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

33 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 142(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai631Delhi483Jaipur246Kolkata210Chennai119Chandigarh115Ahmedabad106Rajkot89Bangalore86Surat73Pune59Indore58Cochin58Visakhapatnam57Raipur53Hyderabad47Amritsar40Guwahati33Lucknow27Agra25Allahabad25Patna25Jodhpur20Nagpur19Ranchi12Varanasi7Jabalpur5Dehradun3Cuttack3

Key Topics

Section 6838Section 14831Addition to Income17Section 25011Section 69C10Section 1479Reassessment9Section 143(3)8Section 270A7

RI-BHOI ISPAT & ROLLING MILLS,BYRNIHAT vs. ITO, WARD- BYRNIHAT, BYRNIHAT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 241/GTY/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati12 Aug 2025AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 133ASection 147Section 250Section 69C

bogus purchases from M/s. Aerocom Trade Exim amounting to Rs.80,46,150/- and from M/s. Eastern Sales India of Rs.85,15,289/- totalling of Rs. 1,65,61,439/- obtained from the departmental "Insight Portal", after being satisfied and on prior approval of the appropriate authority, the case was re-opened u/s.147 of the I.T. Act,1961 by issuing notice

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

Showing 1–20 of 33 · Page 1 of 2

Section 271A7
Penalty7
Deduction4
ITA 66/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

1) of the Income Tax Act was conducted in the case of M/s. Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons Group at its Head Office in Malaya Road, Dibrugarh and the residential premises of the assessees herein at 9/1, Lower Rowdon Street, Block-A, Kolkata-20 on 20.11.2017. The survey operation was also conducted in the business premises of the Group at 190A, Maniktala

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 51/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

1) of the Income Tax Act was conducted in the case of M/s. Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons Group at its Head Office in Malaya Road, Dibrugarh and the residential premises of the assessees herein at 9/1, Lower Rowdon Street, Block-A, Kolkata-20 on 20.11.2017. The survey operation was also conducted in the business premises of the Group at 190A, Maniktala

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 52/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

1) of the Income Tax Act was conducted in the case of M/s. Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons Group at its Head Office in Malaya Road, Dibrugarh and the residential premises of the assessees herein at 9/1, Lower Rowdon Street, Block-A, Kolkata-20 on 20.11.2017. The survey operation was also conducted in the business premises of the Group at 190A, Maniktala

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 53/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

1) of the Income Tax Act was conducted in the case of M/s. Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons Group at its Head Office in Malaya Road, Dibrugarh and the residential premises of the assessees herein at 9/1, Lower Rowdon Street, Block-A, Kolkata-20 on 20.11.2017. The survey operation was also conducted in the business premises of the Group at 190A, Maniktala

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 54/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

1) of the Income Tax Act was conducted in the case of M/s. Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons Group at its Head Office in Malaya Road, Dibrugarh and the residential premises of the assessees herein at 9/1, Lower Rowdon Street, Block-A, Kolkata-20 on 20.11.2017. The survey operation was also conducted in the business premises of the Group at 190A, Maniktala

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 55/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

1) of the Income Tax Act was conducted in the case of M/s. Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons Group at its Head Office in Malaya Road, Dibrugarh and the residential premises of the assessees herein at 9/1, Lower Rowdon Street, Block-A, Kolkata-20 on 20.11.2017. The survey operation was also conducted in the business premises of the Group at 190A, Maniktala

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 56/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

1) of the Income Tax Act was conducted in the case of M/s. Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons Group at its Head Office in Malaya Road, Dibrugarh and the residential premises of the assessees herein at 9/1, Lower Rowdon Street, Block-A, Kolkata-20 on 20.11.2017. The survey operation was also conducted in the business premises of the Group at 190A, Maniktala

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 57/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

1) of the Income Tax Act was conducted in the case of M/s. Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons Group at its Head Office in Malaya Road, Dibrugarh and the residential premises of the assessees herein at 9/1, Lower Rowdon Street, Block-A, Kolkata-20 on 20.11.2017. The survey operation was also conducted in the business premises of the Group at 190A, Maniktala

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 58/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

1) of the Income Tax Act was conducted in the case of M/s. Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons Group at its Head Office in Malaya Road, Dibrugarh and the residential premises of the assessees herein at 9/1, Lower Rowdon Street, Block-A, Kolkata-20 on 20.11.2017. The survey operation was also conducted in the business premises of the Group at 190A, Maniktala

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. BHAGWATI DEVII BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 59/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

1) of the Income Tax Act was conducted in the case of M/s. Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons Group at its Head Office in Malaya Road, Dibrugarh and the residential premises of the assessees herein at 9/1, Lower Rowdon Street, Block-A, Kolkata-20 on 20.11.2017. The survey operation was also conducted in the business premises of the Group at 190A, Maniktala

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 60/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

1) of the Income Tax Act was conducted in the case of M/s. Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons Group at its Head Office in Malaya Road, Dibrugarh and the residential premises of the assessees herein at 9/1, Lower Rowdon Street, Block-A, Kolkata-20 on 20.11.2017. The survey operation was also conducted in the business premises of the Group at 190A, Maniktala

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 61/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

1) of the Income Tax Act was conducted in the case of M/s. Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons Group at its Head Office in Malaya Road, Dibrugarh and the residential premises of the assessees herein at 9/1, Lower Rowdon Street, Block-A, Kolkata-20 on 20.11.2017. The survey operation was also conducted in the business premises of the Group at 190A, Maniktala

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 62/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

1) of the Income Tax Act was conducted in the case of M/s. Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons Group at its Head Office in Malaya Road, Dibrugarh and the residential premises of the assessees herein at 9/1, Lower Rowdon Street, Block-A, Kolkata-20 on 20.11.2017. The survey operation was also conducted in the business premises of the Group at 190A, Maniktala

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 63/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

1) of the Income Tax Act was conducted in the case of M/s. Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons Group at its Head Office in Malaya Road, Dibrugarh and the residential premises of the assessees herein at 9/1, Lower Rowdon Street, Block-A, Kolkata-20 on 20.11.2017. The survey operation was also conducted in the business premises of the Group at 190A, Maniktala

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 64/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

1) of the Income Tax Act was conducted in the case of M/s. Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons Group at its Head Office in Malaya Road, Dibrugarh and the residential premises of the assessees herein at 9/1, Lower Rowdon Street, Block-A, Kolkata-20 on 20.11.2017. The survey operation was also conducted in the business premises of the Group at 190A, Maniktala

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 65/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

1) of the Income Tax Act was conducted in the case of M/s. Nemichand Bamalwa & Sons Group at its Head Office in Malaya Road, Dibrugarh and the residential premises of the assessees herein at 9/1, Lower Rowdon Street, Block-A, Kolkata-20 on 20.11.2017. The survey operation was also conducted in the business premises of the Group at 190A, Maniktala

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati03 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

For Appellant: (1) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153Section 153C

142 or section 148 or to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for his assessment, for that assessment year. 22. A bare perusal of the above provision would reveal that before issuance of a notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act for reopening of assessment, the ld. Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over the assessee

ABCI INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, whereas the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 40/GTY/2022[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Guwahati03 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

For Appellant: (1) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 153Section 153C

142 or section 148 or to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for his assessment, for that assessment year. 22. A bare perusal of the above provision would reveal that before issuance of a notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act for reopening of assessment, the ld. Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over the assessee

RISHI AGARWAL,GUWAHATI vs. ITO, WARD-2(2), GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 266/GTY/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati24 Jun 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 69C

142(1) was issued on 29.11.2022 against which the appellant submitted his reply on 07.12.2022 explaining the fact that party with name as “Vinod” neither appears in the Sales Register nor in the Purchase register of the appellant. Further there is no transaction in the bank also with the said party. This signifies beyond any doubt that the appellant never