BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

32 results for “bogus purchases”+ Exemptionclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,496Delhi768Kolkata499Chennai314Jaipur246Ahmedabad235Bangalore136Pune122Indore120Chandigarh108Hyderabad104Karnataka104Cochin57Lucknow53Surat45Cuttack43Calcutta42Rajkot40Nagpur36Raipur35Guwahati32Visakhapatnam20Ranchi20Amritsar19Patna18Jodhpur11Agra11Varanasi5SC3Panaji3Dehradun2Telangana2Gauhati1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 10(26)24Section 6822Section 153A15Addition to Income15Section 25010Section 1436Section 143(3)5Exemption5Unexplained Cash Credit5

D M JEWELLERS,GUWAHATI vs. ADDITIONAL / JOINT / DEPUTY / ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME-TAX OFFICER, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes only

ITA 107/GTY/2025[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati15 Oct 2025AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das, Hon’Ble & Shri Sanjay Awasthi, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri Manish Jain, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Kausik Ray JCIT
Section 10(26)Section 132Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 68

bogus purchase as per provisions of section 68 of the Act. Page 2 of 4 ITA NO. 107 / GTY / 2025 D.M. Jewellers -Vs- The ITO, Ward-2 (1), Guwahati AY: 2014-15 Being aggrieved, the assessee filed 1st appeal before the ld. 3. CIT(A). The ld. CIT(A) vide order dated 03.02.2025 dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Showing 1–20 of 32 · Page 1 of 2

Natural Justice5
Section 271(1)(c)4
Section 1474

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. BHAGWATI DEVII BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 59/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

exempt u/s 10(38) of the Act as allowed by the law. He was not aware of any scheme providing bogus LTCG. There was no question of any collusion on his part with anyone in this regard. (vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 54/GTY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

exempt u/s 10(38) of the Act as allowed by the law. He was not aware of any scheme providing bogus LTCG. There was no question of any collusion on his part with anyone in this regard. (vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 55/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

exempt u/s 10(38) of the Act as allowed by the law. He was not aware of any scheme providing bogus LTCG. There was no question of any collusion on his part with anyone in this regard. (vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. HANS RAJ BAMALWA (HUF), DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 56/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

exempt u/s 10(38) of the Act as allowed by the law. He was not aware of any scheme providing bogus LTCG. There was no question of any collusion on his part with anyone in this regard. (vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. USHA BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 57/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

exempt u/s 10(38) of the Act as allowed by the law. He was not aware of any scheme providing bogus LTCG. There was no question of any collusion on his part with anyone in this regard. (vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. MEENAKSHI BAMALWA SONI, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 58/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

exempt u/s 10(38) of the Act as allowed by the law. He was not aware of any scheme providing bogus LTCG. There was no question of any collusion on his part with anyone in this regard. (vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. RAVI BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 62/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

exempt u/s 10(38) of the Act as allowed by the law. He was not aware of any scheme providing bogus LTCG. There was no question of any collusion on his part with anyone in this regard. (vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. MADAN LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 63/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

exempt u/s 10(38) of the Act as allowed by the law. He was not aware of any scheme providing bogus LTCG. There was no question of any collusion on his part with anyone in this regard. (vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINOD BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 66/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

exempt u/s 10(38) of the Act as allowed by the law. He was not aware of any scheme providing bogus LTCG. There was no question of any collusion on his part with anyone in this regard. (vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE- 1, DIBRUGARH vs. VISHAL BAMALWA , DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 60/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

exempt u/s 10(38) of the Act as allowed by the law. He was not aware of any scheme providing bogus LTCG. There was no question of any collusion on his part with anyone in this regard. (vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. SHEETAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 64/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

exempt u/s 10(38) of the Act as allowed by the law. He was not aware of any scheme providing bogus LTCG. There was no question of any collusion on his part with anyone in this regard. (vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. PRAMOD KUMAR BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 65/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

exempt u/s 10(38) of the Act as allowed by the law. He was not aware of any scheme providing bogus LTCG. There was no question of any collusion on his part with anyone in this regard. (vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. VINAY BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 61/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

exempt u/s 10(38) of the Act as allowed by the law. He was not aware of any scheme providing bogus LTCG. There was no question of any collusion on his part with anyone in this regard. (vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 51/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

exempt u/s 10(38) of the Act as allowed by the law. He was not aware of any scheme providing bogus LTCG. There was no question of any collusion on his part with anyone in this regard. (vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BAJRANG LAL BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 52/GTY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

exempt u/s 10(38) of the Act as allowed by the law. He was not aware of any scheme providing bogus LTCG. There was no question of any collusion on his part with anyone in this regard. (vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged

D.C.I.T., CIRCLE-1, DIBRUGARH vs. BACHH RAJ BAMALWA, DIBRUGARH

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and that of the Cross Objections of the assessees are allowed

ITA 53/GTY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati01 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

exempt u/s 10(38) of the Act as allowed by the law. He was not aware of any scheme providing bogus LTCG. There was no question of any collusion on his part with anyone in this regard. (vi) That he was not aware of any organized racket of any operators involved in the generation of bogus LTCG as alleged

SAROJ DEVI SAND,SILCHAR vs. INCOEM TAX OFFICER, WARD-3, SILCHAR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA

ITA 51/GTY/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati23 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

purchased @ Rs. 10/- & Rs. 4.05 respectively. Exemption u/s 10(38) of the Act has been claimed on the long term capital gain arising from the said share transactions. The said claim of the assessees was rejected by ld. AO on the ground that M/s. Jackson Investments Ltd. and M/s. Pine Animations Ltd. are penny stock companies, the prices of which

INDER CHAND SAND,SILCHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, SILCHAR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA

ITA 49/GTY/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati23 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68

purchased @ Rs. 10/- & Rs. 4.05 respectively. Exemption u/s 10(38) of the Act has been claimed on the long term capital gain arising from the said share transactions. The said claim of the assessees was rejected by ld. AO on the ground that M/s. Jackson Investments Ltd. and M/s. Pine Animations Ltd. are penny stock companies, the prices of which

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD NORTH LAKHIMPUR vs. BIRI KAKUM, ESS SECTOR

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 170/GTY/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati16 Oct 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: The Ld. Ao. The Ld. Ao Was Not Satisfied With The Response Given By The Assessee & Made The Impugned Addition With The Following Finding:

Section 10(26)Section 145(3)Section 250

bogus purchases on the part of the assessee and hence proceeded to verify the same. It is a matter of record that the assessee produced the books of accounts and other documents before the Ld. AO. The Ld. AO was not satisfied with the response given by the assessee and made the impugned addition with the following finding: “3.8 Considering