BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 69Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai327Delhi214Kolkata61Hyderabad51Jaipur48Chandigarh38Chennai37Bangalore28Indore23Ahmedabad16Agra15Rajkot15Surat9Amritsar9Pune9Visakhapatnam8Nagpur8Raipur7Lucknow7Guwahati4Calcutta2Kerala1Jodhpur1Ranchi1Cochin1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 69C10Section 2504Section 143(3)4Section 194C4Addition to Income4Section 194C(6)3Deduction3Section 143(2)2Section 402TDS

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-SHILLONG, SHILLONG vs. DHAR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, SHILLONG

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is partly allowed

ITA 39/GTY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati22 Jan 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Sri Manomohan Das & Sri Rakesh Mishra

Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 250Section 69C

section 69C. The assessee provided responses to the show cause notice, citing the pandemic's impact on individuals and emphasizing the deduction of TDS

2

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, GUWAHATI vs. SHRI PARAN JYOTI SAIKIA, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 125/GTY/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati28 Mar 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 250Section 69C

69C of the Act observing as follows: “In this case, it is noted that the disallowance of sub-contractor charges was made by the AO on account of purported failure of the Appellant to adduce the evidence as would prove the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the expense amounting to Rs. 1,62,77,232/- claimed by the Appellant under

TRIDENT INFRAPROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(2), GUWAHATI

The appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 254/GTY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Aug 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 10(26)Section 194CSection 194C(6)Section 250Section 40Section 69C

Section 69C of the Act. Regarding these additions, the findings of Ld. CIT(A) deserve to be extracted for the sake of background and reference: “4.5 As regards, the ground relating to disallowance amount of Rs.58,02,792/- by AO on account of non-deduction of TDS

RISHI AGARWAL,GUWAHATI vs. ITO, WARD-2(2), GUWAHATI, GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 266/GTY/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati24 Jun 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Manomohan Das & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 69C

69C, the Tribunal cannot travel beyond that. 2. Ground Nos. 3 to 5: Addition on the basis of document of 3rd party: The issue that addition cannot be made on the basis of an entry in the documents or books of account of a third party or a statement of third party, in absence of corroborative material