BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “TDS”+ Section 201(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,552Delhi1,530Bangalore1,096Chennai646Kolkata462Indore368Pune285Ahmedabad285Karnataka257Jaipur223Cochin203Raipur177Hyderabad175Nagpur155Chandigarh127Cuttack88Surat63Visakhapatnam63Lucknow59Jodhpur56Rajkot56Jabalpur50Ranchi40Panaji36Telangana27Amritsar25Agra25Dehradun24Allahabad18Patna17SC13Kerala11Guwahati10Varanasi8Himachal Pradesh6Rajasthan3Orissa3J&K1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)12Section 20110TDS9Addition to Income8Section 407Natural Justice5Section 143(3)4Section 4(1)4Section 2044Section 4

MAYURPLY INDUSTRIES PVT LTD.,HOOGHLY, WEST BENGAL vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 3, GUWAHATI, ASSAM

In the result IT(SS)A Nos

ITA 224/GTY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati24 Mar 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Manomohan Das, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Siddharth Agarwal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kaushik Roy, DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 253Section 253(5)

201/ [2022] 447 ITR 517 has taken a contrary view. 7.1 In the case of Kabul Chawla (supra), the Delhi High Court, while considering the very issue and on interpretation of section 153A of the Act, 1961, has summarised the legal position as under: Summary of the legal position 38. On a conspectus of section 153A

4
Section 133A4
Survey u/s 133A4

PACPL BIPL JV,GUWAHATI vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF I.T., CPC, BENGALURU (JURISDICTIONAL A.O. - ITO, WARD-3(3), GUWAHATI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 18/GTY/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati22 Sept 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Bleassessment Year: 2018-19 Pacpl Bipl Jv Adit, Cpc, Bengaluru (Jurisdictional A.O. – Ito, 8Th Floor, Unit Ii, Sethi Trust Ward-3(3), Guwahati. Building, G.S. Road, Vs. Bhangagarh, Guwahati, Assam- 781005. Pan: Aadap 9047 J (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Appellant By : Shri Uttam Kumar Borthakur, Advocate Respondent By : Shri N.T. Sherpa, Jcit Date Of Hearing : 26.06.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 22.09.2023 O R D E R Per Sonjoy Sarma, Jm: This Appeal Of The Assessee For The Assessment Year 2018-19 Is Directed Against The Order Dated 05.01.2023 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Appeals, Nfac, Delhi [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Ld. Cit(A)’]. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “I. For That, On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) [Cit(A) For Short Hereafter] Has Erred In Law & In Fact In Not Adjudicating Upon Ground No. 1 Of Appeal Before Him By Holding It To Be General In Nature Though The Determination Of Total Income At Rs. 39846190/- Under Section 143(1), Instead Of Returned Income Of Nil & Seeking Carry Forward Of Current Business Of (-) Rs. 14640/-, Was Contrary To The Relevant Materials, Namely, The Facts & Materials Showing That The Appellant Was Not An Assessee- In- Default Within The Meaning Of First Proviso To Section 201, As Read With Second Proviso To Clause (Ia) Of Sub-Section (A) Of Section 40 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961(Act For Short Hereafter)

For Appellant: Shri Uttam Kumar Borthakur, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri N.T. Sherpa, JCIT
Section 139Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(3)Section 201Section 250Section 40

201(1) and the Form 26A that certified that (1) the paid PACPL Rs.132869313 without tax deduction, (2) the PACPL furnished its return for A.Y. 2018-19 under section 139 on 30/10/2018 vide acknowledgement no. 360923021301018 disclosing taxable income of Rs.63858754 and tax paid thereon of Rs.21113619 and (3) the PACPL had duly incorporated the amount of Rs.132869313, on which

TRIDENT INFRAPROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,GUWAHATI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(2), GUWAHATI

The appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 254/GTY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati06 Aug 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 10(26)Section 194CSection 194C(6)Section 250Section 40Section 69C

2. Before us, the Ld. AR vehemently argued that the issue of alleged non-deduction of TDS was duly argued before both the authorities below and it was demonstrated that either TDS was not deductible in some cases, or even though the TDS had not been made in other cases but evidence of such receipts having been disclosed

RAMKY ECI JV,TELEGANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 160/GTY/2020[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati31 Aug 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Md. Afjal, AdvocateFor Respondent: I. Gyaneshori Devi, JCIT
Section 194CSection 194HSection 201(1)

TDS-1, Guwahati. Considering the material gathered during the course of survey, the learned Assessing Officer assumed that assessee Joint Venture failed to deduct tax as per the provisions of section 194C in respect of payments made to ECI and u/s 194H in respect of payments made to Ramky, therefore, a show cause letter was issued on 22.01.2019, Ramky

RAMKY ECI JV,TELANGANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 159/GTY/2020[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati31 Aug 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Md. Afjal, AdvocateFor Respondent: I. Gyaneshori Devi, JCIT
Section 194CSection 194HSection 201(1)

TDS-1, Guwahati. Considering the material gathered during the course of survey, the learned Assessing Officer assumed that assessee Joint Venture failed to deduct tax as per the provisions of section 194C in respect of payments made to ECI and u/s 194H in respect of payments made to Ramky, therefore, a show cause letter was issued on 22.01.2019, Ramky

M/S. JACK N JILL,DIMAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 14/GTY/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati12 Jun 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Mody, FCAFor Respondent: Shri N. T. Sherpa, JCIT
Section 133ASection 194Section 201Section 201(1)Section 204Section 4Section 4(1)

201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) all dated 15.03.2019 for AYs 2016- 17 to 2019-20 . Since grounds are common and facts are identical, we dispose all these four appeals by this consolidated order for the sake of convenience. 2 ITA Nos.14 - 17/GTY/2022 Jack N Jill

M/S. JACK N JILL,DIMAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 17/GTY/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati12 Jun 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Mody, FCAFor Respondent: Shri N. T. Sherpa, JCIT
Section 133ASection 194Section 201Section 201(1)Section 204Section 4Section 4(1)

201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) all dated 15.03.2019 for AYs 2016- 17 to 2019-20 . Since grounds are common and facts are identical, we dispose all these four appeals by this consolidated order for the sake of convenience. 2 ITA Nos.14 - 17/GTY/2022 Jack N Jill

M/S. JACK N JILL,DIMAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 15/GTY/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati12 Jun 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Mody, FCAFor Respondent: Shri N. T. Sherpa, JCIT
Section 133ASection 194Section 201Section 201(1)Section 204Section 4Section 4(1)

201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) all dated 15.03.2019 for AYs 2016- 17 to 2019-20 . Since grounds are common and facts are identical, we dispose all these four appeals by this consolidated order for the sake of convenience. 2 ITA Nos.14 - 17/GTY/2022 Jack N Jill

M/S. JACK N JILL,DIMAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-1, GUWAHATI

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 16/GTY/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati12 Jun 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Mody, FCAFor Respondent: Shri N. T. Sherpa, JCIT
Section 133ASection 194Section 201Section 201(1)Section 204Section 4Section 4(1)

201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) all dated 15.03.2019 for AYs 2016- 17 to 2019-20 . Since grounds are common and facts are identical, we dispose all these four appeals by this consolidated order for the sake of convenience. 2 ITA Nos.14 - 17/GTY/2022 Jack N Jill

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3, SHILLONG vs. M/S. S.S. NETCOM (P) LIMITED, SHILLONG

In the result, the cross-objection filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 461/GTY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati18 Nov 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Aby. T. Varkey, Hon’Ble& Dr. A.L.Saini, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.461/Gau/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2013-14)

For Appellant: Shri Amitava Sen, JCIT, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri K.M. Roy, AR
Section 10(26)Section 143(3)Section 195(1)Section 197(1)Section 40

section 201. Since no evidence in this regard was furnished, the payments to non-tribals have to be disallowed. M/s S.S. Netcom Private Limited ITA No.461/Gau/2019 & C.O. No. 01/Gau/2020 Assessment Year:2013-14 5.3.1 In view of the above discussion, out of total addition of Rs. 2,49,56,873/- the following disallowance on account of non-deduction