BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “section 68”+ Section 9(1)(vi)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi3,031Mumbai2,286Bangalore927Karnataka611Jaipur552Kolkata539Ahmedabad505Chennai393Hyderabad333Cochin314Chandigarh293Indore243Pune201Surat170Rajkot135Nagpur122Raipur101Cuttack93Visakhapatnam90Lucknow85Guwahati73Panaji64Calcutta64Telangana53SC49Amritsar43Agra38Jodhpur27Dehradun25Allahabad18Patna17Varanasi13Ranchi12Jabalpur7Kerala7Rajasthan6Orissa4Gauhati2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 153A4Section 683Section 1322Search & Seizure2

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. ROHIT KARAN JAIN

ITA/5/2023HC Gauhati12 Mar 2025

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153A

vi) Many such individuals have voluntarily without any enquiry by any authority have voluntarily withdrawn their claim and filed Page No.# 7/22 revised return. vii) As per the Investigation Report of the Directorate of Income Tax (Investigation), Kolkata statements of brokers, operators, director of paper companies that has bought these shares, directors of Penny stock companies all confess to such

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. M/S GOLDSTONE CEMENTS LTD.

ITA/8/2022
HC Gauhati
16 Dec 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

For Respondent: Dr. A. Saraf, Senior Advocate
Section 132Section 153ASection 260ASection 68

9. Pertinent that this Court while admitting the appeal on 24.05.2023 formulated the following substantial questions of law:- (a) Whether the learned Tribunal erred in law in holding that assessee had discharged its burden of substantiation of the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the transactions involving receipt of share application monies? (b) Whether the learned Tribunal was justified in deleting