BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “section 68”+ Section 28(2)(i)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi5,041Mumbai4,340Bangalore1,533Chennai1,066Kolkata1,066Ahmedabad1,009Jaipur880Hyderabad710Karnataka697Pune565Chandigarh453Surat445Indore442Cochin272Raipur253Visakhapatnam202Rajkot186Agra142Nagpur129Lucknow129Amritsar120Cuttack119Telangana118Guwahati97SC83Ranchi79Calcutta77Allahabad68Jodhpur57Patna56Panaji39Jabalpur28Dehradun25Varanasi21Rajasthan10Kerala10Orissa9A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Uttarakhand3Gauhati2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI2HARJIT SINGH BEDI CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD1Andhra Pradesh1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1Tripura1

Key Topics

Section 685Section 153A3Section 260A2Addition to Income2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. M/S GOLDSTONE CEMENTS LTD.

ITA/8/2022HC Gauhati16 Dec 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

For Respondent: Dr. A. Saraf, Senior Advocate
Section 132Section 153ASection 260ASection 68

Section 68 of the Act could not have been invoked or applied in AY 2017-18. For this, we find support in the decisions of the Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in the case of Jatia Investment &Company vs CIT (206 ITR 718) and Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of VISP

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR vs. M/S GOLDSTONE CEMENTS LTD.

ITA/10/2022HC Gauhati
28 Sept 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Section 153ASection 260ASection 68

2) is unearthed during the course of search and the acquisition of such an ‘asset’ being unexplained or undisclosed, which is valued Rs. 50 Lakhs or more, that the AO can be said to be in possession of the jurisdictional fact to initiate proceedings u/s 153A for 7th-10th AY (AY 2011-12, in the instant case). Now, to understand