BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “section 68”+ Section 260Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi657Mumbai174Calcutta136Kolkata92Karnataka55Jaipur52Chennai51Bangalore40Ahmedabad34Hyderabad23Telangana19Nagpur17Cochin15Lucknow13Raipur11SC11Chandigarh7Surat7Indore5Amritsar5Kerala4Cuttack4Visakhapatnam3Allahabad3Jodhpur3Gauhati2Punjab & Haryana2Rajasthan2Jabalpur1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Andhra Pradesh1Tripura1Uttarakhand1Orissa1Agra1Patna1Pune1

Key Topics

Section 685Section 153A3Section 260A2Addition to Income2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. M/S GOLDSTONE CEMENTS LTD.

ITA/8/2022HC Gauhati16 Dec 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

For Respondent: Dr. A. Saraf, Senior Advocate
Section 132Section 153ASection 260ASection 68

68 of the Act which has been elaborated in the preceding paragraph.” 16. Reading the aforesaid paragraphs of the impugned Second Appellate Tribunal’s order, it is manifestly apparent that the decision of the Second Appellate Tribunal is based on evidence. This Tribunal while exercising jurisdiction under section 260A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR vs. M/S GOLDSTONE CEMENTS LTD.

ITA/10/2022
HC Gauhati
28 Sept 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Section 153ASection 260ASection 68

260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for challenging the judgment/order dated 10.12.2021 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Gauhati Bench, Virtual Hearing at Kolkata in ITA Nos.126 to 131/GAU/2020 arising from assessment years 2011-12 to 2015-16 and 2017-18. As all the appeals involve identical factual and legal issues, hence, the same have been heard together