BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 13(1)(e)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai6,142Delhi5,664Bangalore1,942Chennai1,525Kolkata1,400Ahmedabad1,194Jaipur785Hyderabad702Karnataka692Indore637Surat559Pune440Chandigarh394Cochin388Visakhapatnam311Raipur294Rajkot269Cuttack192Nagpur182Lucknow165Agra152Guwahati125Amritsar106Telangana97SC96Allahabad83Ranchi82Jabalpur80Jodhpur75Patna69Calcutta60Panaji39Dehradun28Varanasi26Orissa12Rajasthan11Kerala10A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN4Gauhati3A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Andhra Pradesh1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 153A6Section 685Section 1322Section 260A2Search & Seizure2Addition to Income2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR vs. M/S GOLDSTONE CEMENTS LTD.

ITA/10/2022HC Gauhati28 Sept 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Section 153ASection 260ASection 68

13 | P a g e 1, it is first relevant to understand as to the meaning of the expression “incriminating material” or evidence. There can be several forms of incriminating material or evidence. In order to constitute an incriminating material or evidence, it is necessary for the AO to establish that the information, document or material, whether tangible or intangible

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. ROHIT KARAN JAIN

ITA/5/2023HC Gauhati12 Mar 2025

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Section 131
Section 132
Section 132(4)
Section 139(1)
Section 153A

1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Income Tax Act”) on 31.07.2014 declaring income of Rs.2,00,080/-. However, a search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act was conducted on the residential premises of the sole respondent on 02.06.2016 and thereafter, in continuation of that, on 11.07.2016 again

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. M/S GOLDSTONE CEMENTS LTD.

ITA/8/2022HC Gauhati16 Dec 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

For Respondent: Dr. A. Saraf, Senior Advocate
Section 132Section 153ASection 260ASection 68

E-Ismail Madris-Un-Niswan, reported in (1999) 6 SCC 343. (Apex Court) (2) Hamida & Ors. vs. Md. Khalil, reported in (2001) 5 SCC 30. (Apex Court) (3) Aradhna Oil Mills vs. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr., reported in (2001) 252 ITR 607. (High Court of Madhya Pradesh) (4) Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Gom Industries Ltd., reported