BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 11(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi8,611Mumbai7,368Bangalore2,246Kolkata1,950Chennai1,660Ahmedabad1,637Jaipur1,326Hyderabad1,230Pune1,094Karnataka768Surat761Chandigarh760Indore721Cochin444Raipur408Rajkot367Visakhapatnam346Lucknow229Nagpur229Amritsar213Cuttack212Agra204Guwahati186Telangana148Ranchi113Jodhpur108SC101Calcutta94Jabalpur92Allahabad91Panaji84Patna79Dehradun67Varanasi32Rajasthan19Kerala12Orissa12A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN4Gauhati3Punjab & Haryana3Uttarakhand3ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI2K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Andhra Pradesh1Himachal Pradesh1Tripura1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1

Key Topics

Section 153A6Section 685Section 1322Section 260A2Search & Seizure2Addition to Income2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. M/S GOLDSTONE CEMENTS LTD.

ITA/8/2022HC Gauhati16 Dec 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

For Respondent: Dr. A. Saraf, Senior Advocate
Section 132Section 153ASection 260ASection 68

4) The appeal shall be heard only on the question so formulated, and the respondents shall, at the hearing of the appeal, be allowed to argue that the case does not involve such question: Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall be deemed to take away or abridge the power of the court to hear, for reasons

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR vs. M/S GOLDSTONE CEMENTS LTD.

ITA/10/2022HC Gauhati
28 Sept 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Section 153ASection 260ASection 68

4. Mr. Keyal, learned counsel for the appellants seeking admission of the appeals on the proposed substantial questions of law reproduced (supra) urged that the view taken by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) that the documents seized during the search proceedings being the GCL–HD–1 (Goldstone Cements Limited Hard Drive-1) did not constitute incriminating material

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. ROHIT KARAN JAIN

ITA/5/2023HC Gauhati12 Mar 2025

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153A

68 of the Income tax Act, 1961. As the assessee has deliberately and wilfully concealed her unaccounted income, a conclusion which is obvious from the discussion made in the order, penalty under section 271(1)(c) is also initiated. 16. The total income of the assessee is computed as under in light of the discussions made in the foregoing