BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 10(10)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi9,325Mumbai8,129Bangalore2,367Kolkata2,337Chennai1,827Ahmedabad1,822Jaipur1,426Hyderabad1,316Pune1,159Surat826Chandigarh817Karnataka774Indore750Cochin511Raipur436Rajkot423Visakhapatnam370Nagpur252Amritsar245Lucknow228Cuttack212Agra205Guwahati195Telangana151Ranchi130Jodhpur124SC110Calcutta109Jabalpur106Allahabad99Patna95Panaji92Dehradun76Varanasi36Rajasthan18Kerala13Orissa12Punjab & Haryana5A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN4Uttarakhand3Gauhati3ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Tripura1Himachal Pradesh1Andhra Pradesh1HARJIT SINGH BEDI CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1

Key Topics

Section 153A6Section 685Section 1322Section 260A2Search & Seizure2Addition to Income2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. M/S GOLDSTONE CEMENTS LTD.

ITA/8/2022HC Gauhati16 Dec 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

For Respondent: Dr. A. Saraf, Senior Advocate
Section 132Section 153ASection 260ASection 68

Section 68 of share application money of Rs. 34,69,54,848/- received from Shantidham Marketing Pvt. Ltd., and Orchid Finlease Pvt. Ltd?” 10. Apt therefore

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR vs. M/S GOLDSTONE CEMENTS LTD.

ITA/10/2022HC Gauhati28 Sept 2023

HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Bench:
Section 153ASection 260ASection 68

68 of the Act constituted incriminating material or not, is purely a question of fact. As per Dr. Saraf, the appeals do not involve any question of law much less a substantial question of law and hence, the same do not merit admission. In support of his contentions, Dr. Saraf placed reliance on the following judgments : (i) Principal Commissioner

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. ROHIT KARAN JAIN

ITA/5/2023HC Gauhati12 Mar 2025

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153A

68 of the Income tax Act, 1961. As the assessee has deliberately and wilfully concealed her unaccounted income, a conclusion which is obvious from the discussion made in the order, penalty under section 271(1)(c) is also initiated. 16. The total income of the assessee is computed as under in light of the discussions made in the foregoing