BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 21(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,126Mumbai1,927Bangalore626Chennai621Ahmedabad388Jaipur378Hyderabad354Kolkata347Chandigarh200Surat172Pune171Raipur151Rajkot137Indore121Amritsar97Lucknow68Nagpur64Visakhapatnam59Patna55Guwahati53Agra41Jodhpur39Cuttack38Allahabad37Telangana35Karnataka28Cochin25Dehradun23Panaji9SC5Orissa5Kerala3Ranchi3Varanasi3Gauhati2Himachal Pradesh2Calcutta1Uttarakhand1Rajasthan1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 153A4Section 403Section 1322Search & Seizure2

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. ROHIT KARAN JAIN

ITA/5/2023HC Gauhati12 Mar 2025

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153A

21,00,000/- on account of pre-arranged bogus capital gain in the hands of various family members in the respective years vide his disclosure petition dated 29/08/2016 which was subsequently confirmed by the assessee in his sworn statement. In view of the above the amount of Rs.4,23,30,000/- as disclosed by Shri Rohit Jain on account

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JORHAT vs. M/S. SHYAMA POWER INDIA LTD.,

ITA/10/2019HC Gauhati
01 Aug 2023

Bench: Honourable The Chief Justice Honourable Mrs. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund Judgment Date : 02-08-2023 (S.P. Khaund, J) 1. Heard Mr. S. Chetia, Learned Senior Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department & Mr. G.N. Sahewalla, Learned Senior Counsel For The Respondent Assisted By Learned Counsel Mr. M. Sahewalla. 2. This Is An Appeal U/S 260A Of Income Tax Act, 1961 (The I.T. Act For Short) Against The Order Dated 14.11.2018 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘E’ Court

For Respondent: MR G N SAHEWALLA
Section 132Section 143Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 194CSection 2(22)(e)Section 260ASection 40

21,43,094/- in the account of M/s Meitei in the books of the assessee represented the credit but the same was not paid. As per Section 194C of the I.T. Act, tax is to be deducted at the time of credit of any sum to the account of the sub-contractor or at the time of payment