BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 17(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,339Mumbai2,210Bangalore684Chennai628Jaipur549Ahmedabad514Hyderabad462Kolkata422Pune259Chandigarh238Surat218Raipur180Indore165Visakhapatnam158Rajkot154Amritsar147Cochin82Guwahati72Lucknow71Agra70Cuttack66Patna63Nagpur56Dehradun46Allahabad41Jodhpur37Telangana34Karnataka31Panaji11Ranchi10SC6Kerala5Orissa4Gauhati3Jabalpur3Varanasi3Himachal Pradesh2Calcutta2Uttarakhand1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 153A6Section 403Section 1322Section 260A2Section 682Search & Seizure2Addition to Income2

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. ROHIT KARAN JAIN

ITA/5/2023HC Gauhati12 Mar 2025

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153A

17, 20,000 Total: 14,21,00,000 Shri Karan Rohit Jain also accepted the disclosure of Rs.4,40,50,000/- is Page No.# 4/22 his hand in his sworn statement u/s 131 of the Act on 09/09/2016. 13. However on perusal of the Return of Income for the period under consideration, it is seen that the disclosed amount

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JORHAT vs. M/S. SHYAMA POWER INDIA LTD.,

ITA/10/2019HC Gauhati
01 Aug 2023

Bench: Honourable The Chief Justice Honourable Mrs. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund Judgment Date : 02-08-2023 (S.P. Khaund, J) 1. Heard Mr. S. Chetia, Learned Senior Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department & Mr. G.N. Sahewalla, Learned Senior Counsel For The Respondent Assisted By Learned Counsel Mr. M. Sahewalla. 2. This Is An Appeal U/S 260A Of Income Tax Act, 1961 (The I.T. Act For Short) Against The Order Dated 14.11.2018 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘E’ Court

For Respondent: MR G N SAHEWALLA
Section 132Section 143Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 194CSection 2(22)(e)Section 260ASection 40

147 of the Act. Hence unless there is any incriminating material found during the course of such concluded year, the statute does not confer any power on the learned AO to disturb the findings even thereon and the income determined thereon as finality has already been reached thereon and such proceeding was not pending on the date of search

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR vs. M/S GOLDSTONE CEMENTS LTD.

ITA/10/2022HC Gauhati28 Sept 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Section 153ASection 260ASection 68

2) is unearthed during the course of search and the acquisition of such an ‘asset’ being unexplained or undisclosed, which is valued Rs. 50 Lakhs or more, that the AO can be said to be in possession of the jurisdictional fact to initiate proceedings u/s 153A for 7th-10th AY (AY 2011-12, in the instant case). Now, to understand