BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 132(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,254Mumbai1,227Bangalore430Chennai346Hyderabad266Jaipur247Ahmedabad232Kolkata174Chandigarh129Pune103Surat86Rajkot73Raipur68Amritsar60Nagpur55Indore47Visakhapatnam46Patna45Guwahati40Cochin29Telangana28Lucknow28Allahabad24Agra19Jodhpur19Dehradun11Karnataka10Cuttack8Panaji5SC4Orissa4Gauhati3Kerala2Ranchi2Rajasthan1Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 153A6Section 403Section 1322Section 260A2Section 682Search & Seizure2Addition to Income2

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. ROHIT KARAN JAIN

ITA/5/2023HC Gauhati12 Mar 2025

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153A

5. Being aggrieved with the Assessment Order dated 31.12.2018, the respondent preferred an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Guwahati under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, raising as many as 16 grounds. 6. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), vide order dated 08.04.2019, allowed the said appeal while recording a finding of fact that the Assessing

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JORHAT vs. M/S. SHYAMA POWER INDIA LTD.,

ITA/10/2019HC Gauhati
01 Aug 2023

Bench: Honourable The Chief Justice Honourable Mrs. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund Judgment Date : 02-08-2023 (S.P. Khaund, J) 1. Heard Mr. S. Chetia, Learned Senior Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department & Mr. G.N. Sahewalla, Learned Senior Counsel For The Respondent Assisted By Learned Counsel Mr. M. Sahewalla. 2. This Is An Appeal U/S 260A Of Income Tax Act, 1961 (The I.T. Act For Short) Against The Order Dated 14.11.2018 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘E’ Court

For Respondent: MR G N SAHEWALLA
Section 132Section 143Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 194CSection 2(22)(e)Section 260ASection 40

5. The respondent submitted a reply vide letter dated 24.08.2018 stating inter alia that a reference was given regarding the Ledger Account, which is a part of the regular Books of Accounts maintained by the Assessee Company on his day to day business and the results were duly declared while filing the I.T. Returns, Balance Sheet, Audit Reports etc. since

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR vs. M/S GOLDSTONE CEMENTS LTD.

ITA/10/2022HC Gauhati28 Sept 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Section 153ASection 260ASection 68

5. Per contra, Dr. A. Saraf, learned senior counsel representing the respondent(s) in these appeals, vehemently and fervently urged that whether the seized document i.e. the Hard Drive GCL–HD–1, relied upon by the Assessing Officer for justifying the reassessment under Section 153A and the additions made under Section 68 of the Act constituted incriminating material