BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 13(1)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,452Mumbai2,090Bangalore721Chennai679Kolkata448Jaipur417Hyderabad377Ahmedabad358Pune230Chandigarh181Raipur162Rajkot133Indore121Surat108Amritsar91Visakhapatnam76Lucknow69Patna69Nagpur65Guwahati56Cochin49Agra40Telangana35Jodhpur29Cuttack28Karnataka28Allahabad24Dehradun19Jabalpur10Panaji6Orissa6Kerala5SC5Calcutta5Gauhati2Rajasthan1Uttarakhand1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 153A5Section 682

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. ROHIT KARAN JAIN

ITA/5/2023HC Gauhati12 Mar 2025

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153A

B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI For the Appellant(s) : Mr. S.C. Keyal, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Ms. P. Jain, Advocate (through video- conferencing), Mr. H. Betala and Ms. P.K. Khakolia, Advocates. Date of Hearing : 11.03.2025. Date of judgment : 13.03.2025. Page No.# 2/22 J UDGMENT

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR vs. M/S GOLDSTONE CEMENTS LTD.

ITA/10/2022
HC Gauhati
28 Sept 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Section 153ASection 260ASection 68

147 of the Act, however the ratio decidendi will apply in the present case, because, like Section 147/148 of the Act, the AO gets the authority to assess/reassess the income of a searched person or other person u/s 153A/153C for the extended assessment years (7th to 10th AYs) only if he has in his possession the jurisdictional fact, as discussed