BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 8clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi5,872Mumbai5,154Chennai1,656Bangalore1,422Kolkata1,270Ahmedabad854Hyderabad660Jaipur611Raipur443Pune440Chandigarh366Indore277Karnataka269Rajkot224Surat205Amritsar184Cochin183Visakhapatnam156Patna151Nagpur127Lucknow109Agra100Guwahati100Telangana96Cuttack93Dehradun78Ranchi76Jodhpur70SC45Allahabad45Calcutta31Panaji29Orissa15Jabalpur12Kerala11Rajasthan10Varanasi9A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Punjab & Haryana3Gauhati3Himachal Pradesh2Madhya Pradesh1Uttarakhand1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1J&K1

Key Topics

Section 153A6Section 403Section 1322Section 260A2Section 682Search & Seizure2Addition to Income2

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. ROHIT KARAN JAIN

ITA/5/2023HC Gauhati12 Mar 2025

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153A

8. For the reasons stated hereinbelow, we are in complete agreement with the view taken by the Delhi High Court in the case of Kabul Chawla (supra) and the Gujarat High Court in the case of Saumya Construction (supra), taking the view that no addition can be made in respect of completed assessment in absence of any incriminating material

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JORHAT vs. M/S. SHYAMA POWER INDIA LTD.,

ITA/10/2019HC Gauhati
01 Aug 2023

Bench: Honourable The Chief Justice Honourable Mrs. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund Judgment Date : 02-08-2023 (S.P. Khaund, J) 1. Heard Mr. S. Chetia, Learned Senior Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department & Mr. G.N. Sahewalla, Learned Senior Counsel For The Respondent Assisted By Learned Counsel Mr. M. Sahewalla. 2. This Is An Appeal U/S 260A Of Income Tax Act, 1961 (The I.T. Act For Short) Against The Order Dated 14.11.2018 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘E’ Court

For Respondent: MR G N SAHEWALLA
Section 132Section 143Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 194CSection 2(22)(e)Section 260ASection 40

8. The respondent assessee had filed an appeal being Appeal No. DMP-82 of 2015-16 before the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Jorhat against the order of the Assessing Officer dated 11.09.2015. The finding of the AO was overturned by the CITA Jorhat as the AO failed to disprove the claim of the Naga parties, (sub-contractors

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR vs. M/S GOLDSTONE CEMENTS LTD.

ITA/10/2022HC Gauhati28 Sept 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Section 153ASection 260ASection 68

reassessment under Section 153A and the additions made under Section 68 of the Act constituted incriminating material or not, is purely a question of fact. As per Dr. Saraf, the appeals do not involve any question of law much less a substantial question of law and hence, the same do not merit admission. In support of his contentions, Dr. Saraf