BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 7(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi5,954Mumbai5,394Chennai1,696Bangalore1,424Kolkata1,329Ahmedabad1,092Jaipur975Hyderabad791Pune734Raipur506Chandigarh493Surat414Indore375Visakhapatnam325Amritsar322Rajkot298Cochin282Cuttack250Karnataka193Patna166Nagpur164Agra159Guwahati132Lucknow131Ranchi110Dehradun107Telangana96Jodhpur78Allahabad64SC46Panaji41Calcutta29Jabalpur24Varanasi15Kerala15Orissa13Rajasthan10Punjab & Haryana5A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Gauhati3Himachal Pradesh2K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1J&K1Madhya Pradesh1Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 153A6Section 403Section 1322Section 260A2Section 682Search & Seizure2Addition to Income2

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. ROHIT KARAN JAIN

ITA/5/2023HC Gauhati12 Mar 2025

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153A

7. The relevant portions of the judgment passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) are reproduced hereunder: “The present legal position is that, in an assessment under Section 153A, in absence of any "incriminating material", the completed assessment has to be reiterated. In other words, the completed assessment connot be disturbed in the absence of "Incriminating material”. Even

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JORHAT vs. M/S. SHYAMA POWER INDIA LTD.,

ITA/10/2019
HC Gauhati
01 Aug 2023

Bench: Honourable The Chief Justice Honourable Mrs. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund Judgment Date : 02-08-2023 (S.P. Khaund, J) 1. Heard Mr. S. Chetia, Learned Senior Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department & Mr. G.N. Sahewalla, Learned Senior Counsel For The Respondent Assisted By Learned Counsel Mr. M. Sahewalla. 2. This Is An Appeal U/S 260A Of Income Tax Act, 1961 (The I.T. Act For Short) Against The Order Dated 14.11.2018 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘E’ Court

For Respondent: MR G N SAHEWALLA
Section 132Section 143Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 194CSection 2(22)(e)Section 260ASection 40

7. The AO, in order to verify the correctness of submissions summoned the 8 Naga parties and the Proprietor of M/s Meitei Sri Mohendra Singh Lurembam produced four sub- contractors and their statements were recorded. The Investigation Wing (AO) held that the respondent’s claim that the contract work was executed by individuals belonging to the scheduled tribes

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR vs. M/S GOLDSTONE CEMENTS LTD.

ITA/10/2022HC Gauhati28 Sept 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Section 153ASection 260ASection 68

7 | P a g e 5. Per contra, Dr. A. Saraf, learned senior counsel representing the respondent(s) in these appeals, vehemently and fervently urged that whether the seized document i.e. the Hard Drive GCL–HD–1, relied upon by the Assessing Officer for justifying the reassessment under Section