BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 132(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,495Mumbai2,077Bangalore711Chennai572Hyderabad373Jaipur335Kolkata274Ahmedabad267Chandigarh163Pune120Amritsar89Raipur82Patna77Rajkot75Indore74Nagpur73Cochin67Agra51Surat51Visakhapatnam51Guwahati49Karnataka44Telangana41Lucknow37Jodhpur27Dehradun25Allahabad25Cuttack21SC19Panaji15Ranchi15Kerala6Orissa6Calcutta5Rajasthan5Gauhati3Jabalpur2Punjab & Haryana1Varanasi1Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

Section 153A6Section 403Section 1322Section 260A2Section 682Search & Seizure2Addition to Income2

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. ROHIT KARAN JAIN

ITA/5/2023HC Gauhati12 Mar 2025

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153A

4,23,30,000/- as the same has been made for a year whose assessment stood already completed by virtue of expiration of time limit to issue a notice under Section 143(2) of the Act and without there being any reference to any incriminating material or document. The above grounds of appeal are, hereby, allowed. While adjudicating the above

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JORHAT vs. M/S. SHYAMA POWER INDIA LTD.,

ITA/10/2019HC Gauhati
01 Aug 2023

Bench: Honourable The Chief Justice Honourable Mrs. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund Judgment Date : 02-08-2023 (S.P. Khaund, J) 1. Heard Mr. S. Chetia, Learned Senior Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department & Mr. G.N. Sahewalla, Learned Senior Counsel For The Respondent Assisted By Learned Counsel Mr. M. Sahewalla. 2. This Is An Appeal U/S 260A Of Income Tax Act, 1961 (The I.T. Act For Short) Against The Order Dated 14.11.2018 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘E’ Court

For Respondent: MR G N SAHEWALLA
Section 132Section 143Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 194CSection 2(22)(e)Section 260ASection 40

4. The genesis of the case was that, there was a search and seizure operation u/s 132 of the I.T. Act in the case of the respondent Shyama Power Group India Ltd. from 25.02.2014 upto 18.03.2014. The respondent/assessee had already filed its original return of income for the Assessment Year 2011-2012 in time and time limit for issuance

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR vs. M/S GOLDSTONE CEMENTS LTD.

ITA/10/2022HC Gauhati28 Sept 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Section 153ASection 260ASection 68

4. Mr. Keyal, learned counsel for the appellants seeking admission of the appeals on the proposed substantial questions of law reproduced (supra) urged that the view taken by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) that the documents seized during the search proceedings being the GCL–HD–1 (Goldstone Cements Limited Hard Drive-1) did not constitute incriminating material