BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “reassessment”+ Section 11(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi5,245Mumbai4,578Chennai1,482Bangalore1,317Kolkata1,022Jaipur922Ahmedabad844Hyderabad751Pune612Raipur478Chandigarh429Surat352Indore328Visakhapatnam289Amritsar278Rajkot255Cochin244Cuttack216Karnataka162Nagpur144Agra135Patna122Guwahati121Lucknow112Dehradun90Ranchi90Telangana81Jodhpur63Allahabad50SC44Calcutta36Panaji32Orissa15Jabalpur13Kerala11Rajasthan11Varanasi8A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Punjab & Haryana3Gauhati3Himachal Pradesh2Madhya Pradesh1Uttarakhand1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1J&K1

Key Topics

Section 153A6Section 403Section 1322Section 260A2Section 682Search & Seizure2Addition to Income2

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. ROHIT KARAN JAIN

ITA/5/2023HC Gauhati12 Mar 2025

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153A

11. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the sole respondent has submitted that now it is well settled that in the absence of incriminating material, no addition can be made in respect of a completed assessment. It is contended that in the present case, the assessment was completed but the Assessing Officer without there being any incriminating material

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JORHAT vs. M/S. SHYAMA POWER INDIA LTD.,

ITA/10/2019HC Gauhati
01 Aug 2023

Bench: Honourable The Chief Justice Honourable Mrs. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund Judgment Date : 02-08-2023 (S.P. Khaund, J) 1. Heard Mr. S. Chetia, Learned Senior Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department & Mr. G.N. Sahewalla, Learned Senior Counsel For The Respondent Assisted By Learned Counsel Mr. M. Sahewalla. 2. This Is An Appeal U/S 260A Of Income Tax Act, 1961 (The I.T. Act For Short) Against The Order Dated 14.11.2018 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘E’ Court

For Respondent: MR G N SAHEWALLA
Section 132Section 143Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 194CSection 2(22)(e)Section 260ASection 40

3) or 147 of the Act. Hence unless there is any incriminating material found during the course of such concluded year, the statute does not confer any power on the learned AO to disturb the findings even thereon and the income determined thereon as finality has already been reached thereon and such proceeding was not pending on the date

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR vs. M/S GOLDSTONE CEMENTS LTD.

ITA/10/2022HC Gauhati28 Sept 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND

Section 153ASection 260ASection 68

3. Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, Hon’ble ITAT, Gauhati Bench, Guwahati was ITA No.10/2022; ITA No.7/2022 & ITA No.9/2022 6 | P a g e justified in deleting the addition under Section 68 of share application money of Rs.22,22,99,990/- received from Prefer Infrastructures Private Limited, Capital Steel Trading Private Limited and Consistent Constructions Private