BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “house property”+ Section 13(1)(c)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,071Delhi2,840Bangalore1,095Karnataka683Chennai613Kolkata494Jaipur465Ahmedabad343Hyderabad321Chandigarh248Surat223Pune205Telangana169Indore133Cochin103Amritsar97Rajkot84Raipur80Lucknow77SC66Nagpur62Calcutta61Visakhapatnam53Cuttack46Patna29Guwahati26Agra24Rajasthan17Jodhpur16Varanasi15Kerala13Dehradun12Allahabad11Orissa8A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN4Ranchi4Panaji3Punjab & Haryana3Andhra Pradesh2Gauhati2H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1Himachal Pradesh1J&K1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 683Section 260A2

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER AND POLYMER LIMITED....b

ITA/16/2022HC Gauhati11 Apr 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

Section 260A

Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 preferred by the Revenue/Income Tax Department, involve identical question of facts and law and hence, the same are being heard together and decided by this common judgment and order. Page No.# 3/14 2. These appeals are directed against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (in short, ITAT), Guwahati Bench

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. M/S GOLDSTONE CEMENTS LTD.

ITA/8/2022HC Gauhati16 Dec 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

For Respondent: Dr. A. Saraf, Senior Advocate
Section 132
Section 153A
Section 260A
Section 68

1), Kolkata. The shareholder had explained the strategic business objective behind infusion of share capital into the assessee company, for the reason that it was in the last leg of completion and commissioning of its cement plant. It is noted that the investment was made at the fair market value computed in terms of Rule 11UA of the Rules. Copy