BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1 result for “disallowance”+ Section 88clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,909Delhi3,133Chennai1,107Bangalore1,041Kolkata935Ahmedabad543Hyderabad409Jaipur351Indore260Pune247Surat230Chandigarh226Nagpur133Raipur124Cochin118Amritsar114Visakhapatnam107Rajkot105Agra97Lucknow96Cuttack91Guwahati62Allahabad53Calcutta49Karnataka47Patna45Panaji43Ranchi39Telangana37Jodhpur27SC17Dehradun15Jabalpur8Varanasi5Rajasthan3Kerala3Punjab & Haryana3Himachal Pradesh2ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1Gauhati1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Uttarakhand1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 403

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JORHAT vs. M/S. SHYAMA POWER INDIA LTD.,

ITA/10/2019HC Gauhati01 Aug 2023

Bench: Honourable The Chief Justice Honourable Mrs. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund Judgment Date : 02-08-2023 (S.P. Khaund, J) 1. Heard Mr. S. Chetia, Learned Senior Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department & Mr. G.N. Sahewalla, Learned Senior Counsel For The Respondent Assisted By Learned Counsel Mr. M. Sahewalla. 2. This Is An Appeal U/S 260A Of Income Tax Act, 1961 (The I.T. Act For Short) Against The Order Dated 14.11.2018 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘E’ Court

For Respondent: MR G N SAHEWALLA
Section 132Section 143Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 194CSection 2(22)(e)Section 260ASection 40

disallowed u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act of 1961. 5. The respondent submitted a reply vide letter dated 24.08.2018 stating inter alia that a reference was given regarding the Ledger Account, which is a part of the regular Books of Accounts maintained by the Assessee Company on his day to day business and the results were duly declared while