BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 2(14)(iii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai7,773Delhi6,564Bangalore2,379Chennai2,000Kolkata1,915Ahmedabad1,316Jaipur815Hyderabad750Pune673Chandigarh501Surat465Indore460Raipur409Cochin334Karnataka290Amritsar266Rajkot253Nagpur199Visakhapatnam185Cuttack178Lucknow145Agra112Jodhpur102Telangana84Panaji83Guwahati80SC78Allahabad76Ranchi60Calcutta59Patna52Dehradun39Kerala28Varanasi26Jabalpur17Rajasthan8Punjab & Haryana8Orissa5A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN3Himachal Pradesh2Gauhati2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1

Key Topics

Section 153A4Section 403Section 1322Search & Seizure2

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. ROHIT KARAN JAIN

ITA/5/2023HC Gauhati12 Mar 2025

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153A

14. It is thus clear that even in criminal jurisprudence, the retracted statement shall not carry the evidentiary value, unless it is shown by independent evidence that the original statement was obtained under coercion, duress or influence, mistaken belief of law or facts or otherwise proved erroneous by the deponent. As such a rebuttal letter along with para wise reason

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JORHAT vs. M/S. SHYAMA POWER INDIA LTD.,

ITA/10/2019HC Gauhati
01 Aug 2023

Bench: Honourable The Chief Justice Honourable Mrs. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund Judgment Date : 02-08-2023 (S.P. Khaund, J) 1. Heard Mr. S. Chetia, Learned Senior Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department & Mr. G.N. Sahewalla, Learned Senior Counsel For The Respondent Assisted By Learned Counsel Mr. M. Sahewalla. 2. This Is An Appeal U/S 260A Of Income Tax Act, 1961 (The I.T. Act For Short) Against The Order Dated 14.11.2018 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘E’ Court

For Respondent: MR G N SAHEWALLA
Section 132Section 143Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 194CSection 2(22)(e)Section 260ASection 40

iii) Whether the Hon’ble ITAT was justified in holding that the facts of the present case where inference was drawn from the ledger/books of accounts found during the course was similar to the facts in the case of CIT Vs. Kabul Chawla 380 ITR 573(Del) where addition was made u/s 2