BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 15clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai12,935Delhi10,743Bangalore3,667Chennai3,576Kolkata3,198Ahmedabad1,507Hyderabad1,157Jaipur1,152Pune1,010Surat671Indore619Chandigarh584Raipur506Karnataka371Rajkot331Cochin327Amritsar302Nagpur298Visakhapatnam278Lucknow255Cuttack179Agra139Panaji125Guwahati121Telangana118SC110Jodhpur105Patna87Ranchi87Calcutta79Allahabad76Dehradun69Kerala36Jabalpur33Varanasi32Punjab & Haryana14Orissa9Rajasthan9A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN7Himachal Pradesh5Gauhati2ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Tripura1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1Bombay1

Key Topics

Section 153A4Section 403Section 1322Search & Seizure2

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JORHAT vs. M/S. SHYAMA POWER INDIA LTD.,

ITA/10/2019HC Gauhati01 Aug 2023

Bench: Honourable The Chief Justice Honourable Mrs. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund Judgment Date : 02-08-2023 (S.P. Khaund, J) 1. Heard Mr. S. Chetia, Learned Senior Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department & Mr. G.N. Sahewalla, Learned Senior Counsel For The Respondent Assisted By Learned Counsel Mr. M. Sahewalla. 2. This Is An Appeal U/S 260A Of Income Tax Act, 1961 (The I.T. Act For Short) Against The Order Dated 14.11.2018 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘E’ Court

For Respondent: MR G N SAHEWALLA
Section 132Section 143Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 194CSection 2(22)(e)Section 260ASection 40

disallowances of Rs. 15,46,46,174/- u/s 40(a)(ia) of the I.T. Act, by holding that processing u/s 143(I) is an assessment which is concluded and unabated which cannot be disturbed in the absence of incriminating material found in the course of search. (ii) Whether the Hon’ble ITAT was justified in holding that the inference drawn

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. ROHIT KARAN JAIN

ITA/5/2023HC Gauhati12 Mar 2025

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153A

15. CONCLUSION 15.1. In view of the discussion made above and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the following facts become manifestly clear:- i) That some unscrupulous operators in the capital market were running a scheme of providing entries of LTCG for a commission. ii) The financial result of the Penny Stocks used for the purpose clearly indicate