BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 10(20)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai9,683Delhi8,309Bangalore3,024Chennai2,621Kolkata2,293Ahmedabad1,734Jaipur1,138Hyderabad1,132Pune858Surat642Indore628Chandigarh595Raipur445Rajkot359Cochin314Amritsar302Cuttack261Karnataka256Visakhapatnam247Nagpur246Lucknow219Agra139Jodhpur129Panaji102Guwahati101Allahabad96SC81Ranchi73Telangana71Patna65Dehradun56Calcutta54Varanasi34Jabalpur31Kerala31Rajasthan7Punjab & Haryana6Himachal Pradesh5A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN5Gauhati2H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Tripura1Uttarakhand1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1Orissa1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1

Key Topics

Section 153A4Section 403Section 1322Search & Seizure2

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. ROHIT KARAN JAIN

ITA/5/2023HC Gauhati12 Mar 2025

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153A

20,000 Total: 14,21,00,000 Shri Karan Rohit Jain also accepted the disclosure of Rs.4,40,50,000/- is Page No.# 4/22 his hand in his sworn statement u/s 131 of the Act on 09/09/2016. 13. However on perusal of the Return of Income for the period under consideration, it is seen that the disclosed amount of Rs.4

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JORHAT vs. M/S. SHYAMA POWER INDIA LTD.,

ITA/10/2019HC Gauhati
01 Aug 2023

Bench: Honourable The Chief Justice Honourable Mrs. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund Judgment Date : 02-08-2023 (S.P. Khaund, J) 1. Heard Mr. S. Chetia, Learned Senior Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department & Mr. G.N. Sahewalla, Learned Senior Counsel For The Respondent Assisted By Learned Counsel Mr. M. Sahewalla. 2. This Is An Appeal U/S 260A Of Income Tax Act, 1961 (The I.T. Act For Short) Against The Order Dated 14.11.2018 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘E’ Court

For Respondent: MR G N SAHEWALLA
Section 132Section 143Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 194CSection 2(22)(e)Section 260ASection 40

10(26) of the I.T. Act. The sub- contractors, through their statements both oral and written, have affirmed that the work was done by them for the assessee through M/s Meitei with the understanding to pay 2% commission from the payment of the assessee. Through concurrent decisions by CITA as well as by the ITAT, it was held that