BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 10(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai17,289Delhi13,795Chennai4,865Bangalore4,798Kolkata4,443Ahmedabad1,982Pune1,800Hyderabad1,504Jaipur1,267Surat863Indore761Chandigarh699Raipur624Karnataka564Rajkot511Cochin478Visakhapatnam449Nagpur390Amritsar387Lucknow358Cuttack263Panaji200Agra169Telangana155Jodhpur152Ranchi143Guwahati137Patna130SC129Dehradun103Calcutta103Allahabad90Kerala62Varanasi52Jabalpur50Punjab & Haryana29Rajasthan11Orissa10Himachal Pradesh7A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN6Gauhati2D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Andhra Pradesh1Tripura1Uttarakhand1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Bombay1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1

Key Topics

Section 153A4Section 403Section 1322Search & Seizure2

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. ROHIT KARAN JAIN

ITA/5/2023HC Gauhati12 Mar 2025

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153A

10(38) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. xiii) With so much of evidence against the assessee, the onus was on assessee to prove that his transactions were genuine and that he had not availed benefit of the aforementioned scheme to convert black money into white. xiv) In Sumati Dayal vs. Commissioner of Income Tax .... the Supreme Court observed

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JORHAT vs. M/S. SHYAMA POWER INDIA LTD.,

ITA/10/2019HC Gauhati
01 Aug 2023

Bench: Honourable The Chief Justice Honourable Mrs. Justice Susmita Phukan Khaund Judgment Date : 02-08-2023 (S.P. Khaund, J) 1. Heard Mr. S. Chetia, Learned Senior Standing Counsel, Income Tax Department & Mr. G.N. Sahewalla, Learned Senior Counsel For The Respondent Assisted By Learned Counsel Mr. M. Sahewalla. 2. This Is An Appeal U/S 260A Of Income Tax Act, 1961 (The I.T. Act For Short) Against The Order Dated 14.11.2018 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘E’ Court

For Respondent: MR G N SAHEWALLA
Section 132Section 143Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 194CSection 2(22)(e)Section 260ASection 40

10(26) of the I.T. Act. The sub- contractors, through their statements both oral and written, have affirmed that the work was done by them for the assessee through M/s Meitei with the understanding to pay 2% commission from the payment of the assessee. Through concurrent decisions by CITA as well as by the ITAT, it was held that