BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “depreciation”+ Section 7clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,345Delhi4,834Chennai1,916Bangalore1,827Kolkata1,158Ahmedabad675Hyderabad376Pune328Jaipur315Karnataka225Chandigarh193Raipur173Cochin157Indore148Amritsar110Surat101Visakhapatnam95Lucknow93SC91Rajkot83Telangana67Jodhpur57Cuttack57Nagpur55Ranchi42Guwahati40Patna30Kerala27Calcutta22Panaji21Dehradun14Agra11Allahabad10Punjab & Haryana9Orissa8Jabalpur7Rajasthan6Varanasi6Gauhati2Tripura1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 260A2

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. M/S GREENPLY INDUSTRIES LIMITED

ITA/6/2023HC Gauhati03 Mar 2025

Bench: Honourable The Chief Justice Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair Date Of Hearing : 25.02.2025 Date Of Judgment & Order : 04.03.2025

For Respondent: B SARMA, DR. ASHOK SARAF,MR P BARUAH,MR. N N
Section 115Section 143(3)Section 260A

7 SCC 764, on discussing and analyzing the entire case law, has laid down the basic test to be applied in judging the character of a subsidy. The test is that the character of the receipt in the hands of an assessee, has to be determined with respect to the purpose for which the subsidy is given. In other words

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER AND POLYMER LIMITED....b

ITA/16/2022HC Gauhati
11 Apr 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

Section 260A

7. The appellant, however, relied upon the decision of this Court in Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd. v. CIT [(1997) 6 SCC 117]. That case dealt with the question whether investment of borrowed funds prior to commencement of business, resulting in earning of interest by the assessee would amount to the assessee earning any income. This Court held that