BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “depreciation”+ Section 5(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,667Delhi5,041Chennai2,048Bangalore1,889Kolkata1,262Ahmedabad686Hyderabad380Jaipur346Pune340Karnataka325Chandigarh192Raipur173Cochin171Indore158Amritsar110Surat105Visakhapatnam96SC96Lucknow94Rajkot85Telangana75Jodhpur62Cuttack61Nagpur59Ranchi44Guwahati41Patna35Calcutta32Kerala31Panaji21Dehradun16Punjab & Haryana13Agra13Allahabad10Orissa9Jabalpur8Varanasi6Rajasthan6Gauhati2Himachal Pradesh1D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1S. B. SINHA MARKANDEY KATJU1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Tripura1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1

Key Topics

Section 260A2

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER AND POLYMER LIMITED....b

ITA/16/2022HC Gauhati11 Apr 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

Section 260A

2,961 Equity 1,269 Total 8,920 8. It was contended that the assessee received capital subsidy from the MoCF for setting up the Project. The MoCF specifically prescribed the purposes Page No.# 6/14 and the manner in which the subsidy was to be utilized and the assessee was under an obligation to utilize the capital subsidy as specified

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. M/S GREENPLY INDUSTRIES LIMITED

ITA/6/2023HC Gauhati03 Mar 2025

Bench: Honourable The Chief Justice Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair Date Of Hearing : 25.02.2025 Date Of Judgment & Order : 04.03.2025

For Respondent: B SARMA, DR. ASHOK SARAF,MR P BARUAH,MR. N N
Section 115
Section 143(3)
Section 260A

5 years for the entire States of Uttaranchal and Himachal Pradesh from the date of commencement of commercial production. Page No.# 8/21 9. Dr. Saraf, learned senior counsel, has further submitted that although before the Assessing Officer, the claim for treating the excise duty exemption availed by the assessee under the policy contained in the Office Memorandum, dated