BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “depreciation”+ Section 2clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,639Delhi5,108Chennai2,031Bangalore1,896Kolkata1,228Ahmedabad690Hyderabad385Jaipur351Karnataka347Pune344Chandigarh195Raipur173Cochin169Indore158Amritsar110SC100Lucknow96Visakhapatnam94Surat87Telangana85Rajkot73Jodhpur62Ranchi56Nagpur52Calcutta47Cuttack46Guwahati36Kerala36Patna33Panaji21Punjab & Haryana15Dehradun14Agra14Allahabad10Orissa10Jabalpur8Rajasthan6Varanasi6Gauhati2Himachal Pradesh1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1S. B. SINHA MARKANDEY KATJU1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Tripura1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 260A2

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. M/S GREENPLY INDUSTRIES LIMITED

ITA/6/2023HC Gauhati03 Mar 2025

Bench: Honourable The Chief Justice Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair Date Of Hearing : 25.02.2025 Date Of Judgment & Order : 04.03.2025

For Respondent: B SARMA, DR. ASHOK SARAF,MR P BARUAH,MR. N N
Section 115Section 143(3)Section 260A

depreciation along with subsidy received by the respondent-assessee. It is settled position in law as held by the Apex Court in Apollo Tyres Ltd. v/s. CIT 255 ITR 273 that the Assessing Officer while computing the book profit under Section 115J of the Act has only a power to examine whether the books of account have been maintained

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER AND POLYMER LIMITED....b

ITA/16/2022HC Gauhati
11 Apr 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

Section 260A

2,961 Equity 1,269 Total 8,920 8. It was contended that the assessee received capital subsidy from the MoCF for setting up the Project. The MoCF specifically prescribed the purposes Page No.# 6/14 and the manner in which the subsidy was to be utilized and the assessee was under an obligation to utilize the capital subsidy as specified