BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “depreciation”+ Section 14clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,147Delhi3,841Bangalore1,533Chennai1,338Kolkata887Ahmedabad543Hyderabad330Jaipur296Pune231Karnataka217Chandigarh163Raipur157Indore127Cochin102Amritsar88Visakhapatnam78SC75Surat71Lucknow68Rajkot62Cuttack50Telangana48Ranchi47Nagpur41Jodhpur40Guwahati32Kerala21Patna19Calcutta16Panaji11Dehradun11Agra9Allahabad9Orissa6Varanasi6Rajasthan5Jabalpur5Punjab & Haryana3Gauhati2MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Himachal Pradesh1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Tripura1

Key Topics

Section 260A2

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER AND POLYMER LIMITED....b

ITA/16/2022HC Gauhati11 Apr 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

Section 260A

14. In the case of Commissioner of Income Tax, Trivandrum Vs. Autokast Limited (supra) referred by Mr. S.C. Keyal, in the peculiar facts and circumstances, Hon’ble Supreme Court did not enter into the factual aspects of the matter and accepted the appeal of Revenue by placing reliance on the judgment rendered in the case of Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals Fertilizers

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. M/S GREENPLY INDUSTRIES LIMITED

ITA/6/2023HC Gauhati03 Mar 2025

Bench: Honourable The Chief Justice Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair Date Of Hearing : 25.02.2025 Date Of Judgment & Order : 04.03.2025

For Respondent: B SARMA, DR. ASHOK SARAF,MR P BARUAH,MR. N N
Section 115
Section 143(3)
Section 260A

14. The importance of the judgment of this Court in Sahney Steel case lies in the fact that it has discussed and analysed the entire case law and it has laid down the basic test to be applied in judging the character of a subsidy. That test is that the character of the receipt in the hands of the assessee