BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “depreciation”+ Section 11(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,690Delhi4,341Bangalore1,728Chennai1,638Kolkata1,012Ahmedabad646Hyderabad421Jaipur350Pune335Karnataka257Chandigarh211Raipur194Surat169Indore145Amritsar127Cochin127Visakhapatnam104Cuttack97Lucknow81SC79Rajkot75Telangana58Jodhpur54Nagpur50Ranchi41Guwahati34Panaji26Dehradun22Allahabad21Kerala20Patna20Agra18Calcutta17Varanasi9Orissa7Punjab & Haryana6Rajasthan6Jabalpur4Gauhati2D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1Tripura1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 260A2

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER AND POLYMER LIMITED....b

ITA/16/2022HC Gauhati11 Apr 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

Section 260A

11. There is no quarrel on the factual matrix of the case that the respondent assessee is a public sector undertaking which was assigned the task of setting up the integrated Petrochemical Complex at Lepetkata, District Dibrugarh, Assam. The assessee garnered funds for carrying out the Project through capital subsidy, debt and equity. While the project was underway, the unutilized

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. M/S GREENPLY INDUSTRIES LIMITED

ITA/6/2023HC Gauhati03 Mar 2025

Bench: Honourable The Chief Justice Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair Date Of Hearing : 25.02.2025 Date Of Judgment & Order : 04.03.2025

For Respondent: B SARMA, DR. ASHOK SARAF,MR P BARUAH,MR. N N
Section 115
Section 143(3)
Section 260A

5 years for the entire States of Uttaranchal and Himachal Pradesh from the date of commencement of commercial production. Page No.# 8/21 9. Dr. Saraf, learned senior counsel, has further submitted that although before the Assessing Officer, the claim for treating the excise duty exemption availed by the assessee under the policy contained in the Office Memorandum, dated