BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “depreciation”+ Section 1clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,765Delhi5,062Chennai2,057Bangalore1,896Kolkata1,276Ahmedabad1,136Hyderabad513Pune425Jaipur409Karnataka343Chandigarh267Cochin259Surat219Raipur205Indore204Amritsar142Visakhapatnam138Cuttack138Rajkot112Lucknow99SC99Nagpur83Telangana82Jodhpur79Ranchi66Guwahati45Patna41Calcutta37Panaji35Kerala35Dehradun33Agra30Allahabad23Punjab & Haryana15Jabalpur14Varanasi9Orissa8Rajasthan6Gauhati2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1S. B. SINHA MARKANDEY KATJU1Tripura1Himachal Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 260A2

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER AND POLYMER LIMITED....b

ITA/16/2022HC Gauhati11 Apr 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

Section 260A

1 SCC 645 wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court also considered the judgment rendered in Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals Fertilizers Ltd. Vs. CIT, reported in (1997) 6 SCC 117 and held as below: “7. The appellant, however, relied upon the decision of this Court in Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd. v. CIT [(1997) 6 SCC 117]. That case dealt with

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. M/S GREENPLY INDUSTRIES LIMITED

ITA/6/2023HC Gauhati03 Mar 2025

Bench: Honourable The Chief Justice Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair Date Of Hearing : 25.02.2025 Date Of Judgment & Order : 04.03.2025

For Respondent: B SARMA, DR. ASHOK SARAF,MR P BARUAH,MR. N N
Section 115
Section 143(3)
Section 260A

depreciation along with subsidy received by the respondent-assessee. It is settled position in law as held by the Apex Court in Apollo Tyres Ltd. v/s. CIT 255 ITR 273 that the Assessing Officer while computing the book profit under Section 115J of the Act has only a power to examine whether the books of account have been maintained