BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “depreciation”+ Deductionclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,416Delhi3,763Chennai1,754Bangalore1,597Kolkata973Ahmedabad518Hyderabad303Jaipur301Karnataka262Pune256Chandigarh146Raipur144Cochin142Indore118Visakhapatnam82SC80Lucknow74Telangana62Surat61Amritsar59Rajkot54Nagpur45Ranchi45Jodhpur36Guwahati33Kerala32Calcutta29Cuttack27Patna25Panaji15Dehradun12Punjab & Haryana12Agra9Allahabad9Varanasi6Rajasthan6Jabalpur5Orissa3Gauhati2D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Tripura1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 260A2

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. M/S GREENPLY INDUSTRIES LIMITED

ITA/6/2023HC Gauhati03 Mar 2025

Bench: Honourable The Chief Justice Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair Date Of Hearing : 25.02.2025 Date Of Judgment & Order : 04.03.2025

For Respondent: B SARMA, DR. ASHOK SARAF,MR P BARUAH,MR. N N
Section 115Section 143(3)Section 260A

deduction of the said amount vide his order dated 25.03.2019 under normal provisions of the Act, however, the order is silent on the exclusion of the said amount while computing the book profit under section 115JB of the Act, therefore, the issue is for our examination that "whether the excise duty exemption which is a capital receipt and not chargeable

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER AND POLYMER LIMITED....b

ITA/16/2022HC Gauhati
11 Apr 2023

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA

Section 260A

deductions which is otherwise entitled for the assesse. Hence respectfully Page No.# 11/14 following these principles and the judicial precedents relied upon we hold that the interest income on deposits earned in the sum of Rs.1,18,85,987/- for the Asst. Year 2009-10 (raised by way of additional ground) out of equity funds, shall have to be treated