BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1 result for “condonation of delay”+ Section 2clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai4,206Mumbai4,129Delhi3,405Kolkata2,215Pune1,835Bangalore1,698Ahmedabad1,402Hyderabad1,210Jaipur934Patna754Surat644Chandigarh575Indore538Nagpur511Cochin468Lucknow422Raipur410Visakhapatnam388Rajkot340Karnataka329Amritsar314Cuttack287Calcutta235Panaji175Agra170Dehradun106Guwahati106Jabalpur87Jodhpur83Allahabad73SC66Telangana62Ranchi59Varanasi38Andhra Pradesh21Orissa13Rajasthan11Kerala9Punjab & Haryana9Himachal Pradesh5A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1Gauhati1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1VIKRAMAJIT SEN SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1

SATYAJIT SAHA AND 9 ORS vs. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS

The appeal is allowed

ITA/1/2026HC Gauhati29 Jan 2026

Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Section 19(1)(b)Section 24Section 49

2) of the 2016 Act is also unconstitutional as it is violative of Article 20(1) of the Constitution. b) In rem forfeiture provision under Section 5 of the unamended Act of 1988, prior to the 2016 Amendment Act, was unconstitutional for being manifestly arbitrary. c) The 2016 Amendment Act was not merely procedural, rather, prescribed substantive provisions