BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 14clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,519Delhi2,171Kolkata642Jaipur544Ahmedabad438Chennai418Surat374Bangalore308Pune273Chandigarh222Hyderabad210Indore179Raipur133Karnataka124Amritsar107Nagpur101Rajkot99Visakhapatnam71Cochin64Lucknow62Cuttack60Guwahati53Calcutta47Agra40Jodhpur38Allahabad35Patna23Ranchi20Telangana15Jabalpur9Dehradun9Varanasi7SC6Panaji5Orissa2Gauhati2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 153A4Section 683Section 1322Search & Seizure2

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. M/S GOLDSTONE CEMENTS LTD.

ITA/8/2022HC Gauhati16 Dec 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

For Respondent: Dr. A. Saraf, Senior Advocate
Section 132Section 153ASection 260ASection 68

14. In Navaneethammal v. Arjuna Chetty this Court held: (SCC Headnote) ‘Interference with the concurrent findings of the courts below by the High Court under Section 100 CPC müst be avoided unless warranted by compelling reasons. In any case, the High Court is not expected to reappreciate the evidence just to replace the findings of the lower courts. ... Even assuming

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. ROHIT KARAN JAIN

ITA/5/2023
HC Gauhati
12 Mar 2025

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153A

14. It is thus clear that even in criminal jurisprudence, the retracted statement shall not carry the evidentiary value, unless it is shown by independent evidence that the original statement was obtained under coercion, duress or influence, mistaken belief of law or facts or otherwise proved erroneous by the deponent. As such a rebuttal letter along with para wise reason