2 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 13(1)(a)clear
Sorted by relevance
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
13. In Ramanuja Naidu v. V. Kanniah Naidu this Court held: (SCC Headnote) ‘It is now well settled that concurrent findings of fact of trial court and first appellate court cannot be interfered with by the High Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code. The Single Judge of the High Court totally misconceived