BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “bogus purchases”+ Addition to Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai8,828Delhi3,120Kolkata1,287Ahmedabad696Jaipur694Chennai681Surat475Pune468Bangalore414Chandigarh312Hyderabad272Indore223Raipur195Rajkot146Nagpur130Amritsar126Karnataka116Lucknow92Visakhapatnam92Guwahati78Cochin72Cuttack70Calcutta64Agra63Jodhpur56Patna46Ranchi40Allahabad35Dehradun24Telangana22Jabalpur14Varanasi9Panaji6SC5Orissa3Gauhati2Punjab & Haryana1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Bombay1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 153A4Section 683Section 1322Search & Seizure2

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. ROHIT KARAN JAIN

ITA/5/2023HC Gauhati12 Mar 2025

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153A

purchase details of the shares, copy of demat account, contract notes. The background of the scheme given in the beginning of the order clearly shows that both the requirements are in-built in the scheme and does not ipso facto prove genuineness of transaction. The SEBI after thorough investigation has certified that such transactions are rigged and are carried

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. M/S GOLDSTONE CEMENTS LTD.

ITA/8/2022HC Gauhati
16 Dec 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

For Respondent: Dr. A. Saraf, Senior Advocate
Section 132Section 153ASection 260ASection 68

purchased and the amount of premium were not specified by certain companies, namely Super Finance Ltd. Kolkata, Ganga Builders Ltd. Kolkata. Furthermore, these companies had not enclosed the bank statement. (vi) In addition to above, AO found that: Page No.# 20/29 a. Out of the four companies at Mumbai, two companies were found to be non-existent at the address