BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “bogus purchases”

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai9,060Delhi3,259Kolkata1,342Chennai767Ahmedabad739Jaipur718Pune636Surat476Bangalore432Chandigarh344Hyderabad279Indore237Raipur212Rajkot150Nagpur135Amritsar129Karnataka128Visakhapatnam95Lucknow92Cuttack88Guwahati79Cochin73Calcutta71Agra63Jodhpur59Patna51Ranchi40Allahabad35Dehradun25Telangana24Jabalpur15Varanasi9Panaji7SC7Orissa3Gauhati2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Rajasthan1Punjab & Haryana1Bombay1

Key Topics

Section 153A4Section 683Section 1322Search & Seizure2

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. ROHIT KARAN JAIN

ITA/5/2023HC Gauhati12 Mar 2025

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

Section 131Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 153A

bogus LTCG by pre arranged manner to route the unaccounted income. The same was also admitted in your statement u/s 132(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dtd. 11/07/2016. Please offer your comment. Ans. It was a force submission as such I stand by my affidavit and retraction petition submitted to your office on 07/12/2018. Further my family members

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. vs. M/S GOLDSTONE CEMENTS LTD.

ITA/8/2022HC Gauhati
16 Dec 2024

Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR,HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI

For Respondent: Dr. A. Saraf, Senior Advocate
Section 132Section 153ASection 260ASection 68

purchased and the amount of premium were not specified by certain companies, namely Super Finance Ltd. Kolkata, Ganga Builders Ltd. Kolkata. Furthermore, these companies had not enclosed the bank statement. (vi) In addition to above, AO found that: Page No.# 20/29 a. Out of the four companies at Mumbai, two companies were found to be non-existent at the address