BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 94Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi7Mumbai4Bangalore3Hyderabad1

Key Topics

Section 92C15Section 409Addition to Income7Section 143(3)6Section 144C6Transfer Pricing6Comparables/TP6Section 2012

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S MICROFOFT INDIA (R&D) PVT. LTD, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed and that of the

ITA 691/DEL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Sept 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S. Syal & Shri K. Narasimha Charyassessment Year : 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri Nageshwar RaoFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay I Bara, CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C

section 94A of the Act or any other country or territory that may be notified for the purpose of Chapter X of the Act; Indian Development Centre has no ownership right (legal or 6. economic) on the outcome of the research which vests with the foreign principal and that this is evident from the contract as well as from

MICROSOFT INDIA (R&D) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 5869/DEL/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jun 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava, Jm

For Appellant: Sh. P. S. Pardiwala, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Amrendra Kumar, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 92C

transfer pricing officer as the case may be shall be guided by the conduct of the parties and not merely by the terms of the contract" 2.20 It is further corroborated by the press release by the CBDT on 14 August 2013 while inviting ITA No. 301/Del/2013, 2588/Del/2014, 2058/Del/2015 Microsoft India (R&D) Pvt. Ltd. comments for safe harbour guidelines

M/S. MICROSOFT INDIA (R&D) PVT. LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 301/DEL/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jun 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava, Jm

For Appellant: Sh. P. S. Pardiwala, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Amrendra Kumar, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 92C

transfer pricing officer as the case may be shall be guided by the conduct of the parties and not merely by the terms of the contract" 2.20 It is further corroborated by the press release by the CBDT on 14 August 2013 while inviting ITA No. 301/Del/2013, 2588/Del/2014, 2058/Del/2015 Microsoft India (R&D) Pvt. Ltd. comments for safe harbour guidelines

MICROSOFT INDIA (R&D) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2058/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jun 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava, Jm

For Appellant: Sh. P. S. Pardiwala, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Amrendra Kumar, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 92C

transfer pricing officer as the case may be shall be guided by the conduct of the parties and not merely by the terms of the contract" 2.20 It is further corroborated by the press release by the CBDT on 14 August 2013 while inviting ITA No. 301/Del/2013, 2588/Del/2014, 2058/Del/2015 Microsoft India (R&D) Pvt. Ltd. comments for safe harbour guidelines

MICROSOFT INDIA (R&D) PRIVATE LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 5232/DEL/2010[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jun 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava, Jm

For Appellant: Sh. P. S. Pardiwala, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Amrendra Kumar, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 92C

transfer pricing officer as the case may be shall be guided by the conduct of the parties and not merely by the terms of the contract" 2.20 It is further corroborated by the press release by the CBDT on 14 August 2013 while inviting ITA No. 301/Del/2013, 2588/Del/2014, 2058/Del/2015 Microsoft India (R&D) Pvt. Ltd. comments for safe harbour guidelines

MICROSOFT INDIA (R&D) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2588/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Jun 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava, Jm

For Appellant: Sh. P. S. Pardiwala, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Amrendra Kumar, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 92C

transfer pricing officer as the case may be shall be guided by the conduct of the parties and not merely by the terms of the contract" 2.20 It is further corroborated by the press release by the CBDT on 14 August 2013 while inviting ITA No. 301/Del/2013, 2588/Del/2014, 2058/Del/2015 Microsoft India (R&D) Pvt. Ltd. comments for safe harbour guidelines

M/S. BHARTI AIRTEL LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL. CIT, NEW DELHI

In the result appeal of the assessee with respect to ground No

ITA 5816/DEL/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Oct 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri I.C.Sudhir & Shri Prashant Maharishibharti Airtel Ltd, Addl Cit, Bharti Crescent, 1, Vs. Range-2, Cr Building, Ip Nelson Mandela Road, Vasant Estate, New Delhi Kunj, New Delhi Pan:Aaacb2894G (Appellant) (Respondent) Bharti Airtel Ltd, Addl Cit, Bharti Crescent, 1, Vs. Range-2, Cr Building, Ip Nelson Mandela Road, Vaxant Estate, New Delhi Kunj, New Delhi Pan:Aaacb2894G (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, SrFor Respondent: Sh. NC Swain, CIT DR (OSD)
Section 201Section 254Section 40

94A shall not apply where income is credited or paid to any banking company to which the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 applied. especially when there is no dispute that Kotak Mohindra Bank Ltd, is a banking company to which the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 applies and further that section 19of Banking Regulation Act, 1949 provides that a banking company shall